MR. COHEN
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Ms. Moe
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Client |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
your Honor
|
Professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Ms. Moe
|
Opposing counsel |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Moe
|
Professional adversarial |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
his client
|
Client |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
the client
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
his client
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The Client (Defendant)
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed client ('she')
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Adversarial professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
client (unnamed)
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Chris Everdell
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Defense
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
client (defendant)
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Judiciary counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Our Client (Ghislaine Maxwell)
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Client
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Alleged Victims
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Court hearing | A court hearing to discuss scheduling for an upcoming trial, including setting deadlines and hear... | Southern District Court | View |
| N/A | Court hearing | A discussion in court to establish a motion schedule for a legal case. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion of discovery timeline, with the government requesting until November. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Bail Proceeding where defense argues against the weight of evidence and government tactics. | Courtroom | View |
| 2021-04-01 | N/A | Bail Proceeding | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2021-04-01 | N/A | Court hearing regarding bail/sureties and detention conditions. | Court (Southern District of... | View |
| 2021-04-01 | Court proceeding | A hearing where attorney Mr. Cohen discusses with the judge the difficulties in obtaining financi... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2021-04-01 | Court hearing | The court orders the defendant to be detained pending trial and then adjourns the hearing. | Courtroom | View |
| 2021-04-01 | Bail hearing | An attorney, MR. COHEN, makes a concluding argument to a judge to grant bail for his client. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2021-04-01 | N/A | Court Hearing (Bail/Detention) | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2021-04-01 | N/A | Court Hearing | Court (Southern District) | View |
| 2021-04-01 | N/A | Arraignment, scheduling conference, and bail hearing | Remote Proceeding (Southern... | View |
| 2021-04-01 | N/A | Court Proceeding / Bail Hearing | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2021-04-01 | N/A | Court hearing regarding bail application | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2021-04-01 | Court hearing | A discussion during a legal proceeding about whether the substance of alleged victim statements s... | Court in the Southern Distr... | View |
| 2021-04-01 | N/A | Court proceeding (likely a bail hearing or appeal) where defense counsel argues against the gover... | Southern District (Likely S... | View |
| 2021-04-01 | Court proceeding | A court hearing where defense counsel (Mr. Cohen) is arguing a point to the judge (THE COURT). | Southern District Court (im... | View |
| 2021-04-01 | N/A | Court Hearing (Case 21-770) | Southern District (implied NY) | View |
| 2021-04-01 | N/A | Arraignment on the S1 (Superseding) Indictment | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2021-04-01 | N/A | Court Status Conference and Bail Hearing | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2021-04-01 | Court proceeding | A court hearing where the judge performs a technology check with the defendant and discusses issu... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2021-01-04 | N/A | Court hearing via videoconference regarding waiver of presence. | Virtual/Remote (MDC Brookly... | View |
| 2020-12-10 | N/A | Court Hearing / Bail Hearing | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-12-10 | Court hearing | A court hearing regarding the defendant's pretrial detention, focusing on the legal arguments abo... | Southern District Court (im... | View |
| 2020-12-10 | Bail hearing | An attorney, Mr. Cohen, makes a concluding argument to the court to grant bail for his client. | Southern District Court (im... | View |
EFTA00030015.pdf
Defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim writes to Judge Alison Nathan objecting to a second superseding indictment filed against Ghislaine Maxwell just months before the scheduled July 2021 trial. The defense argues this expansion of charges (covering 1994-2004) constitutes tactical gamesmanship and abuse of power, potentially necessitating a delay in the trial. The letter also requests an in-person arraignment and a new bail hearing, citing issues with remote proceedings and referencing Maxwell's difficult detention conditions.
DOJ-OGR-00001898.jpg
This document is page 21 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on December 10, 2020. The proceedings involve Judge Nathan setting a trial date for July 12, 2021, and establishing deadlines for pretrial motions. Prosecutor Ms. Moe requests to exclude time under the Speedy Trial Act to facilitate discovery review, to which the defense (represented by Mr. Cohen) does not object regarding scheduling.
DOJ-OGR-00001883.jpg
This document is page 6 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on December 10, 2020. It records a dialogue between defense attorney Mr. Cohen, the Judge ('The Court'), and the defendant, Ms. Maxwell. The discussion concerns Maxwell waiving her right to be physically present for the proceeding and agreeing to proceed via videoconference, with the judge confirming the waiver is knowing and voluntary.
DOJ-OGR-00001095.jpg
This document is a court transcript from April 1, 2021, detailing the conclusion of a hearing. The judge rules that the government has proven the defendant is a flight risk and orders the defendant to be detained pending trial. The judge then confirms with both defense counsel (Mr. Cohen) and government counsel (Ms. Moe) that there are no further issues before adjourning the court.
DOJ-OGR-00001080.jpg
This court transcript from April 1, 2021, details a discussion between The Court and Ms. Moe, representing the government, regarding the legal relevance of victim statements in a bail analysis. Following a point raised by Mr. Cohen, The Court seeks the government's position. Ms. Moe clarifies that while victims have a right to participate under the Crime Victims Rights Act, their statements are not part of the government's motion, and their substance should not be considered by the court for the bail analysis.
DOJ-OGR-00001079.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021, from Case 21-770 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Prosecutor Ms. Moe argues that the defendant poses a flight risk and has failed to meet the burden of production to rebut the presumption of detention, citing recommendations from Pretrial Services and victims' requests. The Judge questions Ms. Moe regarding defense attorney Mr. Cohen's arguments about the government's burden of proof regarding flight risk.
DOJ-OGR-00001074.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021. An attorney, Mr. Cohen, is making a concluding argument to a judge to grant bail for his client. He argues that the government has failed to meet its burden of proving the client is a flight risk, distinguishing the current case from others and citing a precedent from Judge Raggi in the Sabhnani case before formally requesting the court to grant bail.
DOJ-OGR-00001071.jpg
This document is a court transcript from April 1, 2021, in which an attorney, Mr. Cohen, argues that his client's detention has limited his access to her, making it difficult to gather financial information. He contends it is unreasonable for Pretrial Services to expect his client to recall details of a real estate transaction offhand, citing complications from the COVID crisis and legal precedents. Mr. Cohen also informs the court that the government requires until November to complete discovery.
DOJ-OGR-00001070.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021, featuring defense attorney Mr. Cohen addressing the Court. Cohen requests more time to arrange sureties for a bail package, citing extreme difficulties caused by his client's (implied to be Ghislaine Maxwell) harsh detention conditions at the MDC. He describes these conditions as equivalent to solitary confinement, including constant lighting, isolation, lack of showers, and confiscation of legal materials.
DOJ-OGR-00001069.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 21-770) dated April 1, 2021. Defense attorney Mr. Cohen argues for bail, claiming the government's indictment of conduct from 1994-1997 is tactical and lacks physical evidence like tapes or video. He asserts that the client has been kept in custody 'by design' and references the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA).
DOJ-OGR-00001068.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (filed 04/01/2021) appearing to be from the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 21-770). Defense attorney Mr. Cohen argues during a bail proceeding that the government's indictment relies on 25-year-old conduct specifically to circumvent the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). He cites the 'Annabi case' regarding the scope of plea agreements and claims the prosecution's strategy is tactical.
DOJ-OGR-00001058.jpg
This document is page 117 of a court transcript from Case 21-770, dated April 1, 2021. Defense attorney Mr. Cohen argues before the Court that his legal team (including Haddon Morgan) had informed the government they were available for the voluntary surrender of their client, Ms. Maxwell, should an indictment occur. Cohen expresses frustration that the government arrested Maxwell without contacting them first and criticizes the government's reply brief for attempting to 'throw dirt' on his client.
DOJ-OGR-00001057.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021. A defense attorney, Mr. Cohen, argues that his client has remained in the U.S. and that counsel has been in frequent contact with the government, suggesting a voluntary surrender could have been arranged. The judge interrupts to seek explicit clarification on whether the defense actually offered to arrange a surrender in the event of an indictment.
DOJ-OGR-00001047.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021. Defense attorney Mr. Cohen argues to the Judge that the government is unfairly introducing new facts late in the process, depriving the defense of a written response. Cohen then pivots to defending his client's character, explicitly stating she is 'not Epstein' and not a 'monster,' emphasizing her strong family and professional support network present on the call anonymously for safety reasons.
DOJ-OGR-00001046.jpg
A transcript from an April 2021 court hearing where defense attorney Mr. Cohen argues for the release of his client (implied to be Ghislaine Maxwell) on bail. Cohen cites the Bail Reform Act, the difficulty of preparing a defense during the COVID crisis while in custody, and explicitly argues that his client is 'not Jeffrey Epstein' and is being unfairly portrayed by the government and media as a 'sinister person.'
DOJ-OGR-00001045.jpg
This page of a court transcript records the conclusion of a victim impact statement by Ms. Farmer urging the detention of Ghislaine Maxwell due to flight risk and the severity of her alleged crimes. Following this, the Court confirms with the government representative, Ms. Moe, that there are no other victims wishing to speak and clarifies that the government is not seeking specific findings regarding danger to the community for pretrial detention purposes.
DOJ-OGR-00001027.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 21-770) involving a detention hearing. Prosecutor Ms. Moe argues that the female defendant (implied to be Ghislaine Maxwell) should be denied bail because she poses an extreme flight risk, has significant undisclosed financial means, strong international ties, and is charged with the sexual abuse of minors. Defense attorney Mr. Cohen is present, and the judge indicates that alleged victims will also be heard.
DOJ-OGR-00001026.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021. The Judge sets a firm trial date for July 12, 2021, and rules to exclude time under the Speedy Trial Act to allow for discovery and defense preparation. The proceedings then transition to arguments regarding the government's motion for detention (bail hearing), involving attorneys Mr. Cohen (Defense) and Ms. Moe (Government).
DOJ-OGR-00001025.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a legal proceeding where the judge, defense counsel (Mr. Cohen), and government counsel (Ms. Moe) discuss scheduling. The court sets a trial date for July 12, 2021. The government, through Ms. Moe, requests that the time between the hearing and the trial be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act to allow for discovery and motions.
DOJ-OGR-00001023.jpg
This document is a transcript page from a court proceeding dated April 1, 2021 (likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell bail hearing). The text details the government's protocol for notifying victims via an opt-in process and outlines how three specific victims will participate in the bail hearing: one via memorandum, one via a statement read by the government, and one speaking directly. Attorneys Ms. Moe and Mr. Cohen confirm they have conferred and agreed upon a schedule with the Court.
DOJ-OGR-00001020.jpg
This document is a court transcript from April 1, 2021, detailing a discussion between the judge, defense counsel (Mr. Cohen), and government counsel (Ms. Moe) about establishing a schedule for motions and discovery. Mr. Cohen clarifies the schedule by adding a previously omitted August 21 deadline for search warrant applications, which Ms. Moe confirms was included in a prior email to the judge's chambers. The parties are working to finalize deadlines for various legal filings in the case.
DOJ-OGR-00001019.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court hearing dated April 1, 2021. The Judge is pressing Ms. Moe (likely a government attorney) on the thoroughness of discovery and timely disclosures. Ms. Moe confirms her team met personally with the FBI in Florida to ensure they obtained a 'comprehensive set of materials.' The Judge emphasizes that they must actively retrieve files rather than just accepting initial representations. The discussion then moves to setting a schedule previously discussed with Mr. Cohen.
DOJ-OGR-00001014.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021, covering the arraignment of Ghislaine Maxwell on a superseding (S1) indictment. The prosecution (Ms. Moe) explains that the new indictment includes a 'ministerial correction' regarding civil docket numbers in the perjury counts (Five and Six). The Judge questions both Maxwell and her attorney, Mr. Cohen, to ensure they have reviewed and discussed the changes.
DOJ-OGR-00001011.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021, concerning Case 21-770. It details a discussion between the Judge, Ms. Moe (Government), and Mr. Cohen regarding the necessity of conducting the arraignment and bail hearing remotely due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Court affirms that the proceeding cannot be delayed as the detained defendant is seeking bail and notes the significant public interest in the case.
DOJ-OGR-00001009.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (filed April 1, 2021) documenting a videoconference hearing involving Ghislaine Maxwell and her attorney, Mr. Cohen. Ms. Maxwell is participating from the MDC in Brooklyn. The court confirms technical connectivity, establishes protocols for private attorney-client conversations via breakout rooms, and acknowledges receipt of a 'waiver of physical presence' form signed by Maxwell on July 10, 2020.
Argument for bail
MR. COHEN makes a concluding argument to the judge, stating that the government has not met its burden of proving his client is a flight risk and requests that the court grant bail.
Detention and Financial Disclosures
Argument regarding the impact of detention and COVID-19 on the defense's ability to gather financial information.
Client's detention, access to client, and discovery sched...
Mr. Cohen argues that his client's detention, compounded by the COVID crisis, has made it difficult to gather financial information. He also discusses the discovery schedule, noting the government needs until November to complete it.
Proposed Schedule
Discussion regarding the scheduling of the case.
Bail Application Argument
Defense argument regarding the NPA, the age of the alleged conduct (1994-1997), lack of physical evidence, and request for bail.
Bail Hearing/Court Proceeding
Oral argument regarding the government's submission of facts and the character of the defendant.
Bail Application
Argument for release on bail, citing COVID difficulties and media bias.
Attorney-Client Discussion
Confirming if the attorney discussed the changes with the defendant.
Bail application and detention conditions
Cohen argues for more time to arrange sureties and describes the harsh conditions hindering the defense's preparation.
Relevance of cited cases
Mr. Cohen responds to the Court's question, stating that he does not believe the cited cases involved defendants with substantial international connections.
Procedural fairness and client characterization
Cohen argues that the government introduced facts late, depriving the defense of a written response. He also defends his client's character, distinguishing her from Epstein.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity