📧 Communication
Court testimony / Direct examinationCommunication Details
From
Unnamed questioner (attorney)
Linked to Unnamed questioner (attorney)
To
Conrad
Conrad
Date
February 15, 2012
Subject
Concealment of legal education during jury selection (voir dire)
Message Content
An attorney questions a juror named Conrad, who admits to deliberately lying to the court about his legal background (having a JD) in order to be selected for a jury. Conrad explains he did this because he believed anyone with legal experience would be dismissed.
📄 Source Document
DOJ-OGR-00009255.jpg
DOJ Collection
Document Summary
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, capturing the direct examination of a juror named Conrad. Conrad admits that during jury selection, he deliberately lied to the court by concealing that he had a law degree from Brooklyn Law School. He states he did this because he believed any potential juror with a legal background would be dismissed, particularly in this case which involved lawyers on trial for tax fraud.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication