Ms. Moe argues that the defense's focus on memory experiments by Professor Loftus is a distraction. She characterizes Loftus as a biased, paid witness whose theories on implanted memories are irrelevant to the powerful, real memories of sexual abuse victims in the case.
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Moe, filed on August 10, 2022. Ms. Moe argues against the credibility and relevance of the defense's expert witness, Professor Loftus, who specializes in memory. She contrasts Loftus's academic experiments on malleable memory with the powerful, traumatic memories of sexual abuse victims, portraying Loftus as a biased, paid advocate for the defense whose testimony is a distraction from the actual facts of the case.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication