📧 Communication

summation

Communication Details

From
To
Court/Jury (implied) Court/Jury (implied)
Date
August 10, 2022
Subject
Critique of defense expert Professor Loftus and the reliability of trauma memory.
Message Content

Ms. Moe argues that the defense's focus on memory experiments by Professor Loftus is a distraction. She characterizes Loftus as a biased, paid witness whose theories on implanted memories are irrelevant to the powerful, real memories of sexual abuse victims in the case.

📄 Source Document

DOJ-OGR-00014469.jpg
DOJ Collection
View Document
Document Summary

This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Moe, filed on August 10, 2022. Ms. Moe argues against the credibility and relevance of the defense's expert witness, Professor Loftus, who specializes in memory. She contrasts Loftus's academic experiments on malleable memory with the powerful, traumatic memories of sexual abuse victims, portraying Loftus as a biased, paid advocate for the defense whose testimony is a distraction from the actual facts of the case.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication