This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Moe, filed on August 10, 2022. Ms. Moe argues against the credibility and relevance of the defense's expert witness, Professor Loftus, who specializes in memory. She contrasts Loftus's academic experiments on malleable memory with the powerful, traumatic memories of sexual abuse victims, portraying Loftus as a biased, paid advocate for the defense whose testimony is a distraction from the actual facts of the case.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Moe | Speaker (likely prosecutor) |
Identified as the person giving the summation in the document's sub-header.
|
| Professor Loftus | Professor / Expert Witness |
Mentioned as a defense expert witness whose experiments on memory are being criticized by Ms. Moe.
|
| Bugs Bunny | Fictional Character |
Mentioned as the subject of one of Professor Loftus's memory experiments, where she tried to convince people they saw...
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Disneyland | company |
Mentioned as the location of an experiment conducted by Professor Loftus.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed in the footer, likely the court reporting agency that transcribed the document.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The location where Professor Loftus conducted an experiment involving Bugs Bunny.
|
"Loftus has made a career of being a witness for the defense."Source
"She admits she is an advocate for the defense."Source
"this case isn't about Bugs Bunny, it isn't about stop signs; it's about sexual abuse, repeated sexual abuse of teenage girls."Source
"So all of that testimony she gave about implanted memories or corrupted memories, it was totally irrelevant to"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,668 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document