Mr. Okula questions the witness, Berke, about what actions he would take upon learning that a suspended attorney, Catherine Conrad, was serving as Juror No. 1. Berke refuses to answer the hypothetical question, calling the premise 'far-fetched'.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated February 24, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named Berke by an attorney, Mr. Okula. Mr. Okula questions Berke about a hypothetical situation involving a suspended attorney, Catherine Conrad, serving as Juror No. 1. Berke repeatedly refuses to answer, calling the scenario 'far-fetched' and an attempt to make him speculate on an experience he's never had.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication