Order striking allegations but allowing Jane Doe 3 to reassert details; denied Giuffre's motion to join but allowed witness participation.
This document is page 10 of a legal response in the defamation case *Edwards v. Dershowitz* (CACE 15-000072). The filing argues against Dershowitz's motion for confidentiality, citing previous orders by Judge Marra in a federal CVRA case. The text explicitly mentions allegations of sexual abuse by Dershowitz against Ms. Giuffre and asserts that previous court orders allow for these factual details to be presented if properly supported.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication