| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
court
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Negotiation of expedited discovery timeline | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal procedure | At the conclusion of the case, confidential documents must be returned to the designating party o... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Agreement on approximately eight weeks for trial preparation due to complexities and S2 indictment | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Investigation into juror misconduct | Court | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A potential hearing is being contemplated where Juror 50 may be a witness. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court proceeding | The court is holding proceedings with partial closure, allowing public access via telephone inste... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiation of a final, omnibus schedule to propose to the Court | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The voir dire process for Ms. Maxwell's trial, during which potential jurors were questioned. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Jury selection | Juror No. 50 provided false answers to questions, which deprived the Court of a basis for inquiry... | Court | View |
| N/A | Work session | Court staff, counsel, and parties worked on a Saturday to prepare for the proceedings. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Jury trial | The document discusses the process of jury selection (empanelling) and challenges for cause withi... | courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Start of a trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), with the judge giving preliminary instructions to the ... | courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Trial proceedings | A judge gives preliminary instructions to the jury at the start of a trial, covering rules of con... | courtroom | View |
| 2022-06-26 | N/A | Deadline for parties to submit positions on Ms. Ransome and Ms. Stein's motion | USDC SDNY | View |
| 2022-06-24 | N/A | Deadline (5:00 p.m.) for submitting statements not objected to | Court | View |
| 2022-06-24 | Legal deadline | Deadline for parties to submit non-objected statements to the Court by 5:00 p.m. | N/A | View |
| 2022-06-24 | Legal deadline | Deadline for either party to file objections to any statement with the Court by 2:00 p.m. | N/A | View |
| 2022-06-24 | N/A | Deadline (2:00 p.m.) for filing objections and statements being objected to | Court | View |
| 2022-06-01 | Legal deadline | Deadline for parties to provide any comments or objections to the first draft Presentence Investi... | N/A | View |
| 2022-03-15 | N/A | Submission of supplemental briefings (Dkt. Nos. 648, 649) | Court Docket | View |
| 2022-03-09 | N/A | Status conference held where Court gave oral directive. | Superior Court of the Virgi... | View |
| 2021-12-08 | Court proceeding | The speaker, likely a judge, outlines the procedure for the voir dire (jury selection) process, s... | Court | View |
| 2021-12-08 | Jury selection discussion / voir dire process | A discussion regarding the selection of prospective jurors, including the creation and review of ... | Implied to be a courtroom o... | View |
| 2021-12-06 | Legal proceeding | A stipulation, marked as Defendant's Trial Exhibit B, was dated and signed by the parties. | N/A | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Opening statements scheduled to occur. | USDC SDNY | View |
This document is a "NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT" from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on July 26, 2019, in the case of United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 19CR490). It announces the filing of an official transcript for a hearing held on July 18, 2019, and details the procedures and deadlines for parties to request redactions of personal data identifiers from the transcript.
This legal document, filed on July 2, 2020, is a court finding that justifies providing public access to court proceedings via telephone conference. The court argues this measure is narrowly tailored to protect public health from COVID-19 and is less restrictive than in-person hearings, which have attendance limitations. This approach allows for broad public access, even for individuals who would otherwise be barred from the courthouse under a previous order (Standing Order 20-9).
This legal document, filed on October 22, 2021, for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, outlines the court's procedures and schedule for jury selection (voir dire). It sets deadlines in November for submitting juror questionnaires, schedules a potential in-person conference, and details the voir dire process for November 16-19, which will be conducted with public access while considering COVID-19 protocols. The court also denies a request from the parties to seal the questionnaires until after jury selection is complete, citing the need for a fair trial and public access.
This document is a page from a legal filing, specifically an excerpt from a subpoena form (AO 89B) filed in a criminal case. It outlines sections of the Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17, detailing the legal requirements for producing documents, serving subpoenas, the geographic scope of service, and the consequences of non-compliance, such as being held in contempt of court. The rules also provide protections for victims when their personal information is sought.
This document is page 77 of 83 from a court filing dated December 19, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It outlines Jury Instruction No. 57, explaining 'Stipulations,' instructing the jury that they must accept agreed-upon facts as true and accept that stipulated witnesses would have given specific testimony, though the weight of that testimony remains for the jury to decide.
This document is a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. In it, a judge provides preliminary instructions to the jury, emphasizing their duty not to discuss the case with anyone and explaining that all parties and counsel are forbidden from interacting with them. The judge also details the courtroom's specific COVID-19 safety protocols, which require witnesses and lawyers to use a Plexiglas enclosure with a HEPA filter when speaking.
Ms. Sternheim describes past communications where lawyers were present in proffer sessions, providing information to the government to help build cases for settlement.
Transcript spans 91 pages; bail arguments on pages 22-79.
Supplemental order stating victims may re-refile documents omitting stricken portions.
Order striking allegations but allowing Jane Doe 3 to reassert details; denied Giuffre's motion to join but allowed witness participation.
Ordering parties to confer regarding undocketed letters/briefings and set a deadline of July 12, 2022 for filings.
Submission of revised redactions to the parties' briefing on the Defendant's motion for a new trial
Projected deadline for an order via email.
Ordering production of materials from the second production of the Epstein Victims Compensation Program.
Order regarding sealing/redactions and motion in limine for Accuser-3.
Order regarding transportation, security concerns, and legal mail issues at MDC.
Order dated October 31, 2021 (Dkt. No. 406)
Discussion on probing jurors for dishonesty.
Denies specific order but sets expectation for 1-day mail delivery.
Parties conferred about the government's letter but were unable to reach an agreement.
New date for status conference via remote video.
Original scheduled date for status conference (adjourned).
Scheduling arraignment for April 23, 2021 and setting rules for overflow rooms.
Denying motions to dismiss, granting severance of perjury counts, setting deadlines.
Directing the docketing of certain reply briefs and setting deadlines for redaction requests.
Referenced order prompting this response.
Judge adopts proposed redactions for specific motions.
Court allowed parties to respond to MDC letter.
Status report regarding settlement progress
The Court took up the motion regarding release.
Referenced as Dkt. 49.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity