📧 Communication

Court proceeding dialogue

Communication Details

From
To
THE COURT THE COURT
Date
August 10, 2022
Subject
Argument against defendant's motion regarding enticement charges (Counts One and Two)
Message Content

Mr. Rohrbach argues that the defendant's motion should be denied because the defendant enticed Jane to travel to New York by building a relationship with her and playing on her hopes and desires, which fits the legal definition of enticement.

📄 Source Document

DOJ-OGR-00013834.jpg
DOJ Collection
View Document
Document Summary

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, in which an attorney, Mr. Rohrbach, argues against a defendant's motion to dismiss enticement charges. Rohrbach contends that the defendant, along with an associate named Epstein, manipulated a person named Jane by building a multi-year relationship and playing on her 'hopes and desires' to entice her to travel to New York. This conduct, Rohrbach argues, squarely meets the legal definition of enticement, and therefore the charges should stand.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication