DOJ-OGR-00013834.jpg

598 KB

Extraction Summary

6
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 598 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, in which an attorney, Mr. Rohrbach, argues against a defendant's motion to dismiss enticement charges. Rohrbach contends that the defendant, along with an associate named Epstein, manipulated a person named Jane by building a multi-year relationship and playing on her 'hopes and desires' to entice her to travel to New York. This conduct, Rohrbach argues, squarely meets the legal definition of enticement, and therefore the charges should stand.

People (6)

Name Role Context
THE COURT Judge
Speaks briefly at the beginning of the excerpt and is addressed as 'your Honor' by Mr. Rohrbach.
Mr. Rohrbach Attorney
The primary speaker in this excerpt, arguing against the defendant's motion on behalf of the government.
defendant Defendant
The subject of the legal motion and argument, accused of enticement and building a relationship with Jane.
Jane Victim/Witness
An individual whose travel to New York and relationship with the defendant are central to the enticement charges bein...
Mr. Everdell Attorney
Mentioned by Mr. Rohrbach as having a 'very narrow view' on the legal nexus required for enticement, suggesting he re...
Epstein Associate of the defendant
Mentioned as having built a relationship with Jane alongside the defendant.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. Company
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.

Timeline (3 events)

2022-08-10
An attorney, Mr. Rohrbach, presents an argument to the court to deny the defendant's motion regarding charges of enticement conspiracy and substantive counts.
Southern District Court (implied)
Jane's travel to New York, which the prosecution argues was the result of enticement by the defendant and Epstein.
New York
The defendant and Epstein built a relationship with Jane over a multi-year period, which involved the defendant playing on her hopes and dreams and developing a friendship.

Locations (1)

Location Context
The destination to which Jane traveled, allegedly as a result of the defendant's enticement.

Relationships (3)

defendant Manipulative Jane
The document states the defendant 'played on her hopes and dreams to make her feel special, seen, and cared for' to get her into a 'relationship over a multi-year period' and 'developed a friendship'.
defendant Associates Epstein
They are mentioned as jointly building a relationship with Jane: 'the relationship that the defendant and Epstein built with Jane.'
Epstein Manipulative Jane
Epstein is mentioned as co-building the relationship with Jane alongside the defendant, which was used to entice her.

Key Quotes (3)

"Your Honor, the Court should deny the defendant's motion as to Counts One and Two."
Source
— Mr. Rohrbach (Stating the purpose of his argument to the judge.)
DOJ-OGR-00013834.jpg
Quote #1
""Enticement" is defined as using hope and desire."
Source
— Mr. Rohrbach (Providing a legal definition to support his argument that the defendant's actions constituted enticement.)
DOJ-OGR-00013834.jpg
Quote #2
"Jane's testimony is that the defendant played on her hopes and dreams to make her feel special, seen, and cared for."
Source
— Mr. Rohrbach (Summarizing testimony to show how the defendant's actions align with the legal definition of enticement.)
DOJ-OGR-00013834.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,688 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 243 of 267
LCAVMAX8
1 Counts One and Two, the enticement conspiracy and substantive
2 counts.
3 THE COURT: All right. Thank you.
4 Mr. Rohrbach.
5 MR. ROHRBACH: If I may take the podium, your Honor.
6 Your Honor, the Court should deny the defendant's
7 motion as to Counts One and Two.
8 Jane was not in New York by accident. In fact,
9 there's no nonsexualized purpose that's been articulated at
10 this point for Jane to travel to New York.
11 Mr. Everdell takes a very narrow view on the nexus
12 that's required between enticement, inducement, and the other
13 verbs that are in the enticement statute and the travel itself.
14 The jury could readily conclude, as the government has argued,
15 that all of Jane's travel to New York was in the context of the
16 relationship that the defendant and Epstein built with Jane.
17 That meets each of the verbs in the statute.
18 Jane's testimony is that the defendant played on her
19 hopes and dreams to make her feel special, seen, and cared for.
20 "Enticement" is defined as using hope and desire. So the
21 defendant was playing on Jane's hopes and desires in order to
22 get her into this relationship over a multi-year period in
23 which she was traveling with the defendant.
24 Similarly, persuasion, the defendant testified that --
25 sorry, Jane testified that the defendant developed a friendship
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013834

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document