📧 Communication

note

Communication Details

From
To
["The Court"] ["The Court"]
Date
May 01, 2011
Subject
Jury instructions on vicarious liability and respondeat superior
Message Content

Juror Conrad sent a note to the court asking about jury instructions, which prompted lawyer Trzaskoma to re-investigate the juror's identity.

📄 Source Document

DOJ-OGR-00010131.jpg
DOJ Collection
View Document
Document Summary

This legal document details the events of March and May 2011 concerning the law firm Brune & Richard. The firm's lawyers, led by Trzaskoma, investigated whether a juror named Conrad was the same person as a suspended Bronx lawyer with the same name. After reviewing evidence such as voir dire answers and a Westlaw profile, they concluded the two were different people and, lacking actual knowledge or strong suspicion, had no ethical duty to disclose their findings to the court.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication