Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Juror Conrad

Person
Mentions
2
Relationships
4
Events
3
Documents
1
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
4 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person prosecutor
Communication
5
1
View
person prosecutor
Correspondence
1
1
View
person Brune & Richard lawyers
Legal representative
1
1
View
person Lawyer Conrad
Identity confusion
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2011-06-20 Receipt of communication Brune & Richard lawyers received a copy of juror Conrad's letter to the prosecutor. N/A View
2011-06-20 N/A Receipt of juror Conrad's letter to the prosecutor. Unknown View
2011-05-01 N/A Juror Conrad sends a note regarding vicarious liability; lawyers reinvestigate potential identity... Court/Office View

DOJ-OGR-00010131.jpg

This legal document details the events of March and May 2011 concerning the law firm Brune & Richard. The firm's lawyers, led by Trzaskoma, investigated whether a juror named Conrad was the same person as a suspended Bronx lawyer with the same name. After reviewing evidence such as voir dire answers and a Westlaw profile, they concluded the two were different people and, lacking actual knowledge or strong suspicion, had no ethical duty to disclose their findings to the court.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
5
As Recipient
0
Total
5

Unknown

From: Juror Conrad
To: Unknown

A letter from Juror Conrad, whose tone and content prompted the defendants' lawyers to investigate her.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Juror misconduct

From: Juror Conrad
To: prosecutor

A letter from juror Conrad to the prosecutor, a copy of which was received by Brune & Richard lawyers on June 20.

Letter
2011-06-20
Communication Source

Jury Instruction Question

From: Juror Conrad
To: THE COURT

Asking if jury would be instructed on vicarious liability and respondeat superior.

Note to court
2011-05-01
Communication Source

Jury instructions on vicarious liability and respondeat s...

From: Juror Conrad
To: ["The Court"]

Juror Conrad sent a note to the court asking about jury instructions, which prompted lawyer Trzaskoma to re-investigate the juror's identity.

Note
2011-05-01
Communication Source

Unknown

From: Juror Conrad
To: The Prosecutor

Letter triggering an investigation into juror misconduct.

Letter
0020-06-01
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search