📧 Communication

Jury Note

Communication Details

Subject
Clarification on Indictment
Message Content

An ambiguous jury note was analyzed to see if it implied a constructive amendment. The court found it clearly referred to the second element of Count Four of the Indictment.

📄 Source Document

DOJ-OGR-00021898.jpg
DOJ Collection
View Document
Document Summary

This page from a legal document discusses whether a constructive amendment to an indictment occurred during a trial. The court concludes that neither the Government's evidence, including Jane's testimony, nor an ambiguous jury note constituted such an amendment. The court agrees with the lower District Court, finding that its jury instructions properly captured the "core of criminality" of the charged offense.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication