📧 Communication
meetingCommunication Details
From
Mr. Pagliuca
Linked to MR. PAGLIUCA
To
The Court
THE COURT
Date
August 10, 2022
Subject
Admissibility of evidence paragraphs
Message Content
Argument regarding whether specific paragraphs (12 and 206) are factually inconsistent with testimony.
📄 Source Document
DOJ-OGR-00018800.jpg
DOJ Collection
Document Summary
This document is page 202 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a legal argument between attorney Mr. Pagliuca and the Judge regarding the admissibility of specific paragraphs describing Jeffrey Epstein's 'systematic pattern of sexually exploited behavior' utilizing a network of employees. The Judge sustains an objection regarding paragraph 206, ruling it is not inconsistent with testimony.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication