📧 Communication

letter

Communication Details

From
Subject
Reconsideration of response
Message Content

Seeking reconsideration claiming constructive amendment or prejudicial variance.

📄 Source Document

DOJ-OGR-00000021.jpg
DOJ Collection
View Document
Document Summary

This document is page 20 of an appellate court opinion (likely 2nd Circuit) dated September 17, 2024, affirming a District Court's denial of Ghislaine Maxwell's motion. Maxwell argued that testimony regarding sexual abuse in New Mexico constituted a 'constructive amendment' or 'prejudicial variance' violating the Fifth Amendment because it differed from the indictment charges. The court rejected this argument and affirmed the lower court's ruling.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication