📧 Communication
courtroom dialogueCommunication Details
From
Mr. Shechtman
Linked to Mr. Shechtman
To
["Judge"]
["Judge"]
Date
February 24, 2022
Subject
Argument regarding a split jury verdict for Mr. Parse
Message Content
Mr. Shechtman argues against the government's assertion that his client, Mr. Parse, benefited from a particular juror. He contends that the juror was a partisan who couldn't follow instructions, and the resulting split verdict was due to her inability to persuade other jurors, not a benefit to his client.
📄 Source Document
DOJ-OGR-00009502.jpg
DOJ Collection
Document Summary
This document is a court transcript from February 24, 2022, capturing an argument by an attorney, Mr. Shechtman, before a judge. Shechtman refutes the government's claim that his client, Mr. Parse, benefited from a "partisan" juror, arguing instead that the resulting split verdict was due to this juror's inability to persuade others to convict, not because her presence was advantageous to the defense.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication