Ms. Sternheim requests to raise an issue at sidebar with the Judge, and the Judge agrees.
Mr. Shechtman argues against the government's assertion that his client, Mr. Parse, benefited from a particular juror. He contends that the juror was a partisan who couldn't follow instructions, and the resulting split verdict was due to her inability to persuade other jurors, not a benefit to his client.
Mr. Shechtman argues against the government's assertion that his client, Mr. Parse, benefited from a particular juror. He contends that the juror was a partisan who couldn't follow instructions, and the resulting split verdict was due to her inability to persuade other jurors, not a benefit to his client.
An attorney argues before a judge that the opposing counsel's failure to investigate a matter was not a strategic choice ('sandbagging') but rather carelessness and ineptitude, which constitutes prejudice in the case.
An unnamed speaker addresses a judge, arguing for the court's involvement in an investigation. The speaker highlights the dreadful conditions of the local jail, affecting Jeffrey Epstein and others, comparing them unfavorably to Guantanamo, and stresses the importance of public confidence in the justice system.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity