The Court held a conference to ask the defendants if they were aware of disturbing information revealed about Juror Conrad. Trzaskoma responded on their behalf.
This legal document analyzes statements made by defense lawyers in a memorandum regarding their investigation of a juror named Conrad. The author, likely a judge, concludes that while the lawyers' phrasing could have been clearer and may have led to unintended inferences, their statements were not knowingly false or a violation of ethical rules. The analysis specifically addresses a July 15 telephone conference where a lawyer, Trzaskoma, denied prior awareness of certain facts, a statement the author finds consistent with the lawyers' overall position.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication