📧 Communication

Telephone conference

Communication Details

To
["Defendants' counsel (including Trzaskoma)"] ["Defendants' counsel (including Trzaskoma)"]
Date
November 07, 2025
Subject
Awareness of facts concerning Juror Number One [Conrad]
Message Content

The Court held a conference to ask the defendants if they were aware of disturbing information revealed about Juror Conrad. Trzaskoma responded on their behalf.

📄 Source Document

DOJ-OGR-00009454.jpg
DOJ Collection
View Document
Document Summary

This legal document analyzes statements made by defense lawyers in a memorandum regarding their investigation of a juror named Conrad. The author, likely a judge, concludes that while the lawyers' phrasing could have been clearer and may have led to unintended inferences, their statements were not knowingly false or a violation of ethical rules. The analysis specifically addresses a July 15 telephone conference where a lawyer, Trzaskoma, denied prior awareness of certain facts, a statement the author finds consistent with the lawyers' overall position.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication