A legal argument between the judge and attorneys about whether the jury can consider a witness's testimony for conspiracy counts, given a prior limiting instruction.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between attorneys and a judge about a jury's question. The core issue is whether the testimony of a witness named 'Annie' can be considered for conspiracy counts, given a prior instruction that her testimony did not describe illegal sexual activity. The judge rules that the testimony is relevant and can be permissibly considered by the jury for those counts.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication