Each other
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Group of girls
|
Know each other social circle |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
All listed individuals
|
Co participants in a working group |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Group of girls
|
Social circle |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Group of girls
|
Know each other |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Group of three girls
|
Know each other go to school together |
5
|
1 |
Failure to disclose information and in camera review of d...
The Court expresses concern over the government's failure to disclose what it knew at the time of filing a motion. Mr. Shechtman acknowledges the point and states his intention to turn over the documents for the Court to review in camera, arguing it is the inevitable outcome.
Protest coordination
Communicating via Facebook and Twitter
Applicability of the 2004 Manual and the timeline of an o...
A dialogue during a court proceeding where Ms. Moe argues for the government that an offense continued past November 1, 2004, based on trial testimony. The Court reframes the key question to whether conspiratorial conduct can be proven to have occurred within the specific window of November and December 2004.
Jury instructions and trial logistics
An attorney argues for a supplemental jury instruction regarding the applicability of New York law to actions in New Mexico. The Court rejects this, stating the original instruction is correct, and then discusses concerns about trial interruptions due to a health 'variant' and the need for jurors to plan for extended deliberations.
Logistics of presenting evidence (binder and video)
A discussion between the judge and attorneys about providing a binder of evidence to a witness and the court, and confirming the technical setup for playing a video in the main courtroom but not the overflow room.
Admissibility and consideration of 'Annie's testimony'
A legal argument between the judge and attorneys about whether the jury can consider a witness's testimony for conspiracy counts, given a prior limiting instruction.
Preparation of evidence for the jury
The judge and counsel discuss the logistics of preparing and delivering requested transcripts and a deposition to the jury, including handling redactions and informing the jury of a short delay.
Jury deliberation schedule and transcript requests
The court confirms the jury deliberation schedule, including over holidays. The court reads a jury note requesting the transcripts of expert witness Elizabeth Loftus. Counsel (Ms. Moe) raises an issue with the transcript of Cimberly Espinosa and defers to a colleague.
Courtroom procedure for handling exhibit binders for the ...
A discussion between the judge and attorneys about the logistics of distributing binders of sealed exhibits to the jury. They discuss timing and placement, ultimately agreeing to put the binders under the chairs.
Admissibility of hearsay testimony
Attorneys and the judge discuss how to question witness A. Farmer about her reasons for traveling to New Mexico. The debate centers on whether a conversation with her mother is inadmissible hearsay or can be used to explain the witness's state of mind and willingness to see Jeffrey Epstein again.
Response to a jury question regarding jury instructions
A discussion between the judge and two attorneys about how to properly respond to a jury's question. Mr. Everdell suggests referring the jury to a specific instruction, but Ms. Moe disagrees, believing it doesn't address the jury's actual query about Count Four.
Purpose of testimony regarding message pad entries
Ms. Moe explains to the court that testimony is needed to connect various entries for a person named 'Carolyn' in message pad exhibits. By analyzing the continuity of phone numbers, they can establish that different entries (e.g., 'Carolyn', 'Caroline', 'Carolyn with a last name') refer to the same person, which helps the jury understand the evidence.
Witness communication and potential rule violation
A dialogue between the Court and Mr. Rohrbach about the need to investigate whether a witness's testimony was improperly shared with another person, potentially violating the spirit of a court rule.
Testimony, court exhibits, and redaction of notes
A discussion in court regarding testimony from Carolyn and Special Agent Jason Richards about an exhibit. Ms. Sternheim requests copies of court notes, and the Court states they must be redacted because the jury foreperson signed them.
Witness sequestration and scheduling of future testimony
A discussion in court regarding a potential violation of a witness sequestration order, the need to brief the issue, and scheduling for the next day, including a decision on whether 'Brian' will testify.
Jury instructions and a jury note
The judge and counsel discuss dismissing the jury for the evening and then address a note from the jury (Court Exhibit 9) asking for clarification on how to interpret a witness's testimony.
Sequence of statements in court
Ms. Moe asks the Court whether victim statements should be heard before or after statements from the parties. The Court outlines the anticipated order: government, victim statements, defense counsel, and then Ms. Maxwell. Ms. Moe and Ms. Sternheim both agree to this ordering.
Investigation into past events
MP is interviewing the speaker about a series of events including a fight at school and the discovery of $300.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity