📧 Communication

answers to interrogatories

Communication Details

From
To
opposing party in a legal case opposing party in a legal case
Message Content

Mr. Scarola wrote the answers, which were signed by his client. The speaker, Ms. Sternheim, argues these are not privileged.

📄 Source Document

DOJ-OGR-00011723.jpg
DOJ Collection
View Document
Document Summary

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing legal arguments about privileged communications. An attorney, Ms. Sternheim, argues that answers to interrogatories and a complaint are not privileged, while another attorney, Ms. Comey, begins to dispute the accuracy of a deposition. The judge rules that arguments about a witness's story changing over time due to the involvement of civil lawyers are matters to be presented to a jury.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication