Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Client

Person
Mentions
39
Relationships
31
Events
47
Documents
18
Also known as:
Unnamed Client 3 New Client Client 3 Client 1 (Unnamed) Client 2 (Unnamed) Sister of Client 2 Client (implied)
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
31 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
organization Office of the Attorney General
Legal representative
7
2
View
person Edward Snowden's Russian Lawyer
Professional
5
1
View
person Goldman Sachs
Financial
5
1
View
person Speaker
Client
5
1
View
person Unnamed speaker (attorney)
Professional
5
1
View
person JACK A. GOLDBERGER
Client
5
1
View
person The girl who died
Transactional alleged victim
5
1
View
organization UBS
Financial
5
1
View
person Author
Legal representative
5
1
View
person Mr. Cohen
Professional
5
1
View
person lawyer
Professional
5
1
View
person Gerald B. Lefcourt
Professional
5
1
View
person MR. SCAROLA
Client
5
1
View
person Ms. Brune
Client
5
1
View
person Assistant (Unnamed)
Employee
5
1
View
person the firm
Client
3
3
View
person GLORIA ALLRED
Client
2
2
View
person FBI agents
Adversarial
1
1
View
person James R. Marsh
Client
1
1
View
organization Marsh Law Firm PLLC
Client
1
1
View
person MR. COHEN
Client
1
1
View
organization GOVERNMENT
Defendant prosecutor state
1
1
View
person Pretrial Services
Subject of inquiry
1
1
View
person Michael Bachner
Client
1
1
View
person Joe Nascimento
Client
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Proffer meeting between Client, Attorney, and Assistant United States Attorney Office of the United States... View
N/A N/A Client asked Jeffrey for help; Jeffrey initially refused but agreed based on friendship. N/A View
N/A N/A Sexual assault by Jeffrey Epstein against the client while she was employed by Ghislaine Maxwell. London View
N/A Detention A client was arrested and held in custody at the MDC under conditions akin to solitary confinemen... MDC, jail View
N/A N/A Interview/Meeting between SDNY/FBI and Jill Greenfield's client London, UK (Likely) View
N/A N/A Interview meeting in London with the client, Greenfield, US lawyer friend, and SDNY team. London, UK View
N/A N/A Massage incident New Mexico Ranch View
N/A N/A Meeting in a room for sex A room (hotel/private) View
N/A N/A Sexual encounter charged by prosecutors State where age of consent ... View
N/A Meeting A scheduled visit with a client at the Metropolitan Detention Center. Metropolitan Detention Cent... View
N/A N/A FBI raid on client's property. Client was in pajamas with one security guard. Defense claims clie... The property (House) View
N/A N/A Client's arrest and detention despite voluntary surrender. N/A View
2024-03-24 N/A Client verification and consent to retain Marsh Law Firm for joint prosecution. Digital/Online View
2024-03-24 N/A Execution of legal agreement/retainer between Marsh Law Firm PLLC and a client Digital/Online View
2021-08-20 N/A Scheduled in-person meeting. Federal Building, New York ... View
2021-08-20 N/A In-person meeting at federal buildings. New York (implied by 'feder... View
2021-05-18 N/A Date for client to review highly confidential images at 500 Pearl Street 500 Pearl Street View
2021-05-14 N/A Video conference interview (WebEx) with client. Virtual (WebEx) View
2021-05-14 N/A Video conference interview via WebEx. Virtual (WebEx) View
2021-05-14 N/A WebEx video conference interview and signing of proffer agreement. Virtual (WebEx) View
2021-05-14 N/A Video conference (WebEx) interview. Virtual (WebEx) View
2021-04-01 N/A Arrest and detention of the client. MDC View
2020-11-12 N/A Continuation of the proffer meeting New York, New York View
2020-10-07 N/A Proffer meeting held by video conference Video conference (hosted by... View
2019-10-23 N/A FBI Victim Services Meeting FBI / New York View

EFTA00037151.pdf

This document is page 4 of a legal representation agreement, likely related to the Epstein litigation given the Bates stamp EFTA00037151. It outlines terms regarding joint representation, attorney fee division with associated counsel, conflict waivers regarding the representation of other victims against the same defendants, and the client's responsibility for litigation expenses.

Legal agreement (retainer/representation agreement)
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00037149.pdf

A legal document from Marsh Law Firm PLLC outlining a Joint Representation and Prosecution Agreement. The document discusses the consolidation of claims for multiple clients who are survivors of sexual abuse and exploitation, advising the client on the advantages and disadvantages of joint representation. It appears to be part of a larger discovery file, marked with Bates stamp EFTA00037149.

Legal agreement (joint representation and prosecution agreement)
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00037145.pdf

This document is page 7 of a legal engagement agreement (Bates EFTA00037145) outlining the terms for 'Discharge and Withdrawal' and 'Conclusion of Services'. It specifies the conditions under which the Client or Firm may terminate the relationship, the Client's financial obligations for expenses and fees upon termination, and the Firm's policy for retaining case files for three years before destruction.

Legal agreement (retainer/engagement letter)
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00037142.pdf

This document is page 5 of a legal retainer agreement between a client and a law firm. It details the handling of litigation expenses, the allocation of awarded attorney's fees and sanctions, and explicitly states that client approval is necessary for any settlement. The document touches on the potential for multiple cases involving bankruptcy and trusts/estates counsel.

Legal agreement (retainer/representation contract)
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00037137.pdf

This document is a screenshot of a digital signature page (page 8/9) for a legal agreement involving Marsh Law Firm PLLC, dated March 24, 2024. It displays a signature by Founding Partner James R. Marsh and a pending signature field for a client. The document includes a Bates stamp 'EFTA00037137' and appears to be a retainer or service agreement viewed on a mobile device via Adobe Sign.

Legal agreement / retainer contract (digital signature page screenshot)
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00037135.pdf

This document is a page from a legal retainer agreement outlining the duties of the client and the attorney's fee structure. It specifically details contingency fees for claims filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), explicitly mentioning claims against the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). The fees are set at 20% for pre-suit FTCA resolutions, 25% for filed FTCA lawsuits, and 33 1/3% for other claims.

Legal agreement (retainer/fee agreement)
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00025355.pdf

This document is a chain of email correspondence between defense attorneys at Winston & Strawn and Assistant US Attorneys at the SDNY from July to September 2019. The correspondence concerns an investigation into a female client (likely Ghislaine Maxwell), including scheduling meetings, discussing an attorney proffer, and the defense reporting threats made against the client's husband. A critical revelation in the text is the SDNY's assertion that they possess telephone records proving the client had numerous contacts with multiple underage girls.

Email chain / legal correspondence
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00019831.pdf

This document is an unexecuted template of a Proffer Agreement ('Queen for a Day' letter) from the Office of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, dated January 14, 2019. The agreement outlines the terms under which a client provides information to the government, specifying that it is not a cooperation agreement and establishing limited use immunity for statements made during the meeting, with exceptions for impeachment, rebuttal, and derivative leads.

Proffer agreement (template)
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00018272.pdf

This document is an email chain involving US Attorney Geoffrey Berman discussing a chance encounter with attorney Reid Weingarten at the Odeon restaurant on July 12, 2019. Weingarten mentioned meeting his client (implied to be Jeffrey Epstein) and indicated he might have an 'interesting conversation' with the prosecution team. The email chain also raises a concern about a potential conflict of interest requiring a 'Curcio' hearing because Weingarten's son works for a redacted entity (likely within the DOJ or SDNY).

Email chain
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00001066.jpg

This is a page from a court transcript (Case 21-770, dated April 1, 2021) where a defense attorney argues against the detention of their client. The attorney asserts that transferring funds after being dropped by a bank and filing required disclosures (SDAR) with the Treasury Department in 2018 and 2019 regarding a foreign bank account are acts of compliance, not evidence of hiding assets or intent to evade. The defense also begins to cite Judge Raggi's opinion in the Sabhnani case regarding physical restraint.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00001059.jpg

A transcript page from a court proceeding (dated April 1, 2021) where a defense attorney argues that the government is misrepresenting the circumstances of their client's arrest to influence the judge and media. The attorney details that the client (likely Ghislaine Maxwell based on the description) was in pajamas with one security guard, the doors were unlocked, and she moved to another room as a safety protocol rather than attempting to flee when FBI agents raided the property.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00000661.jpg

This document is a court transcript where an attorney expresses significant doubt about the official ruling of suicide in their client's death at the MCC on August 10, 2019. The attorney cites corrupted video evidence, which is now with the FBI, and questions whether this was a pre-existing issue, drawing a parallel to another secure prison. The attorney asks the judge to investigate the death and voices frustration over receiving information from the media instead of the U.S. Attorney's office.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00001944.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated December 10, 2020, discussing a client's detention and the discovery process. Mr. Cohen argues that his client's arrest, despite voluntary surrender, limits access and that the COVID crisis complicates gathering financial information. He also highlights the government's request for an extended discovery period until November.

Court transcript / legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00001943.jpg

This document is an excerpt from a court transcript dated December 10, 2020, detailing a discussion between attorney Mr. Cohen and The Court. Mr. Cohen describes the severe, solitary confinement-like conditions his client endured at the MDC, including denial of basic rights and access to legal counsel, and requests more time to address the court's concerns regarding financial matters. The Court seeks clarification on the nature of the client's detention, specifically if there was consent.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00030473.jpg

A legal letter from defense attorney Jack A. Goldberger arguing against the prosecution of his client (implied to be Jeffrey Epstein). Goldberger attempts to discredit the accuser ('this girl') by citing her drug use and claiming she lied about her age (claiming 18) and that 'no sex occurred,' only a topless massage for $200. He urges the recipient (likely the State Attorney's office) to pursue an 'informal resolution' rather than filing charges, citing the permanent reputational damage caused by internet searches.

Legal correspondence / attorney letter
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00021330.jpg

This document is a page from a legal filing, specifically from case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on April 16, 2021. It outlines several of the Florida Bar’s Rules of Professional Conduct (FRPC) that are applicable to attorneys practicing before the court. The page details the rules for Competence (FRPC 4-1.1), Diligence (FRPC 4-1.3), and Candor in Dealing with Others (FRPC 4-4.1), providing explanations and context from the official comments to these rules.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018613.jpg

This document appears to be a page from an interview transcript (likely evidence in a House Oversight investigation) featuring an interview between Clarisse Thorn and a woman named Olivia. Olivia details her experiences as a sex worker, discussing specific financial negotiations with various clients ranging from $300 to $3,000, and describes how she manages her open marriage and her husband's feelings of jealousy regarding her financial independence. The text references a 2009 New York Times Magazine article about the website used to facilitate these meetings.

Interview transcript / article excerpt (evidence file)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017290.jpg

This document appears to be a page from a manuscript draft (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the reference to his book 'The Best Defense') submitted to the House Oversight Committee. It details two specific legal cases involving attempted murder: one involving the 'factual impossibility' of killing a corpse, and another utilizing a biblical analogy (the 'Abraham Defense') regarding a man who threatened his sister's abuser but was stopped by police. Both cases highlight complex legal defenses regarding intent and impossibility, resulting in the clients going free.

Manuscript draft / legal memoir excerpt
2025-11-19
Analysis Source
Total Received
$46,500,000.00
7 transactions
Total Paid
$207,009,404.23
29 transactions
Net Flow
-$160,509,404.23
36 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
N/A Paid Client narrator $35.00 First legal fee charged per hour. View
N/A Paid Client Olivia Chantecaille $400.00 Given for dinner with a friend. View
N/A Paid Client Olivia Chantecaille $3,000.00 Paid up front to see her 3 times a month. View
N/A Received Unknown Client $4,000,000.00 Found in Eileen's drawer View
N/A Received Unknown Client $8,000,000.00 Created in deductions View
N/A Received Unknown Client $500,000.00 Found in mistakes / Saved at the last minute View
N/A Paid Client N/A $100,000,000.00 Cash management amount mentioned View
N/A Paid Client sender $40.00 Proposal for first year (additional 17 making i... View
N/A Paid Client sender $120.00 Total approx for new workover over 3 years. View
N/A Paid Client Unknown $0.00 Transfer of funds out of a bank after the bank ... View
N/A Paid Client plaintiff $0.00 Civil lawsuits seeking 'millions of dollars' fr... View
N/A Paid Client b2kcorp.com $15.00 Hourly rate for services ($15/hour+) View
N/A Paid Client taskseveryday.com $6.98 Hourly rate for dedicated virtual assistant View
N/A Paid Client yourmaninindia.com $6.25 Hourly rate for services ($6.25/hour+) View
N/A Paid Client appraisal firm (i... $0.00 Contingency fee: 20% of Amount Recovered for FT... View
N/A Paid Client appraisal firm (i... $0.00 Contingency fee: 25% of Amount Recovered for FT... View
N/A Paid Client appraisal firm (i... $0.00 Contingency fee: 33 1/3% of Amount Recovered fo... View
N/A Paid Client the firm $0.00 Obligation to pay Expenses incurred prior to wi... View
N/A Paid Client Olivia Chantecaille $400.00 Birthday spending money in envelope. View
2025-11-01 Received Dormant Accounts Client $11,000,000.00 Money found by author in dormant accounts. View
2025-11-01 Received Unknown Client $11,000,000.00 Found in dormant accounts View
2025-11-01 Received Eileen's Drawer Client $4,000,000.00 Money found by author. View
2025-11-01 Received Tax Authorities Client $8,000,000.00 Deductions created by author (spelled 'millino'). View
2020-01-01 Paid Client LLC $500.00 Hourly rate for Criminal Case In-person Deposit... View
2020-01-01 Paid Client LLC $350.00 Hourly rate for Criminal Case Remote Research, ... View
As Sender
3
As Recipient
7
Total
10

Representation Strategy (Joinder vs Individual)

From: Law Firms
To: Client

Explanation of the pros and cons of joining multiple plaintiffs in a single case versus pursuing individual lawsuits, specifically regarding child sex abuse cases.

Legal advisory
N/A
Communication Source

Regular calls

From: Defense counsel
To: Client

A scheduling system has been instituted at the MDC for defense counsel to request regular calls with their client.

Call
N/A
Communication Source

Legal consultation

From: Defense counsel
To: Client

The document mentions a scheduling system at the MDC that defense counsel can use to request regular calls with their client.

Phone call
N/A
Communication Source

No Subject

From: Client
To: opposing party in a le...

Mr. Scarola wrote the answers, which were signed by his client. The speaker, Ms. Sternheim, argues these are not privileged.

Answers to interrogatories
N/A
Communication Source

Draft response to USVI AG appeal

From: Daniel H. Weiner
To: Client

No preview available

Communication
2021-03-27
Communication Source

Proffer Meeting

From: Client
To: US Attorney's Office

Meeting to provide information to the government under proffer protection.

Meeting
2019-07-12
Communication Source

SDAR / Foreign Filing

From: Client
To: U.S. Treasury Department

Disclosure of a foreign bank account.

Filing
2018-01-01
Communication Source

Contact Information

From: UBS
To: Client

Contact info provided for Achim Peijan (achim.peijan@ubs.com) and Daniela Steinbrink Mattei (daniela.steinbrinkmattei@ubs.com)

Email contact info
2012-06-19
Communication Source

N/A

From: jeffrey E.
To: Client

Detailing payments owed

Email
0015-04-01
Communication Source

N/A

From: jeffrey E.
To: Client

Email saying you would have to pay more

Email
0001-05-01
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search