A Daily Mail reporter informed Juror No. 50 about 'Question 48', causing the juror to struggle for an explanation for a false answer.
This legal document argues that 'Juror No. 50' is not credible. It cites a nonsensical explanation the juror gave to a Daily Mail reporter for a false answer on a questionnaire. The document further refutes the juror's claim that he 'flew through' the questionnaire by highlighting the Court's explicit instructions for careful and truthful completion.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication