This legal document argues that Ms. Maxwell is not a flight risk, citing prior court decisions where defendants who knew of impending charges did not flee. It emphasizes that the government had no evidence of Ms. Maxwell planning to leave the country and arrested her without warning before a holiday. The document further contends that Ms. Maxwell's actions to avoid public scrutiny after Epstein's arrest do not indicate an intent to flee.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
The government arrested Ms. Maxwell; Ms. Maxwell’s Actions to Protect Herself From Intrusive Media Coverage and Death...
|
| Epstein |
one-year anniversary of Epstein’s arrest; after Epstein’s arrest
|
|
| DiGiacomo | Defendant |
United States v. DiGiacomo
|
| defendant | Defendant |
defendant posed a flight risk; defendant took 'no steps' to flee
|
| counsel | Legal representative |
government alerted her counsel
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States | government agency |
United States v. DiGiacomo
|
| government | government agency |
allegation by the government; government has offered no proof; government alerted her counsel; government arrested Ms...
|
| 2d Cir. | court |
837 F.2d 48, 49-50 (2d Cir. 1988)
|
| D. Mass. | court |
746 F. Supp. 1176, 1179-80 (D. Mass. 1990)
|
"no steps"Source
"for three years knew there was substantial evidence of the likely charges against them and did not attempt to flee before indictment"Source
"Ms. Maxwell’s Actions to Protect Herself From Intrusive Media Coverage and Death Threats Do Not Demonstrate an Intent to Flee"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (2,091 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document