EFTA00018705.pdf
30.7 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
4
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email
File Size:
30.7 KB
Summary
An internal email chain within the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York dated July 11, 2019. A Public Affairs officer reports receiving a tip from 'The Journal' that a dozen FBI agents were seen at Epstein's mansion that afternoon. A colleague confirms the activity ('Yes') but agrees that declining to comment to the press was the correct course of action.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| REDACTED | Sender (Original Email) |
Public Affairs officer at USANYS asking about a media tip regarding FBI agents.
|
| REDACTED | Sender (Reply Email) |
USANYS official confirming the FBI activity and approving the decision to decline comment.
|
| FBI Agents | Law Enforcement |
About a dozen agents reported to be at the mansion.
|
Organizations (4)
Timeline (1 events)
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
Relationships (1)
Public Affairs Officer
→
Media Inquiry
→
The Journal
The Journal just got a tip... I obviously declined
Key Quotes (3)
"The Journal just got a tip that about a dozen FBI agents in jackets were back at the mansion at around 2:50 this afternoon."Source
EFTA00018705.pdf
Quote #1
"I obviously declined, but is this a thing?"Source
EFTA00018705.pdf
Quote #2
"Yes. But correct to decline."Source
EFTA00018705.pdf
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (895 characters)
From: [REDACTED] (USANYS)" <[REDACTED]>
To: [REDACTED] (USANYS)" <[REDACTED]>, [REDACTED] (USANYS)" <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] (USANYS) [Contractor]" <[REDACTED]>, [REDACTED] (USANYS)" <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE: New Epstein Search?
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 19:33:51 +0000
Importance: Normal
To: [REDACTED] (USANYS)" <[REDACTED]>, [REDACTED] (USANYS)" <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] (USANYS) [Contractor]" <[REDACTED]>, [REDACTED] (USANYS)" <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE: New Epstein Search?
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 19:33:51 +0000
Importance: Normal
Yes. But correct to decline.
From: [REDACTED] (USANYS) [REDACTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2019 3:34 PM
To: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] (USANYS) [Contractor] <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Subject: New Epstein Search?
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2019 3:34 PM
To: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] (USANYS) [Contractor] <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Subject: New Epstein Search?
The Journal just got a tip that about a dozen FBI agents in jackets were back at the mansion at around 2:50 this afternoon.
I obviously declined, but is this a thing?
I obviously declined, but is this a thing?
[REDACTED]
Public Affairs
United States Department of Justice
U.S. Attorney's Office | Southern District of New York
[REDACTED BLOCK]
Public Affairs
United States Department of Justice
U.S. Attorney's Office | Southern District of New York
[REDACTED BLOCK]
EFTA00018705
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document