DOJ-OGR-00001971.jpg
381 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
381 KB
Summary
This document is a court order dated December 14, 2020, issued by United States District Judge Alison J. Nathan. The order directs the Defendant to docket redacted documents and exhibits, affirming that the redactions are appropriately tailored to protect individual privacy interests. The Court's decision is based on balancing competing considerations against the common law presumption of access, citing legal precedents like *United States v. Amodeo* and *Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc.*.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| ALISON J. NATHAN | United States District Judge |
Signed the order as the judge
|
| Defendant |
Party ordered to docket redacted documents and exhibits; submitted documents with privacy interests
|
|
| Nixon |
Party in the cited case Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc.
|
|
| Amodeo |
Party in the cited case United States v. Amodeo
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States | government agency |
Party in the cited case United States v. Amodeo
|
| Warner Commc'ns, Inc. | company |
Party in the cited case Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc.
|
| Court | government agency |
The judicial body issuing the order and making findings
|
| 2d Cir. | government agency |
Refers to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in a legal citation
|
Timeline (1 events)
2020-12-14
The Court ordered the Defendant to docket redacted documents and corresponding exhibits, finding that the redactions are narrowly tailored to guard privacy interests while upholding the common law presumption of access.
New York, New York
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where the order was dated
|
Relationships (1)
Judge issuing an order to a party in a legal case.
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (787 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 95 Filed 12/14/20 Page 2 of 2
United States v. Amodeo ("Amodeo I"), 44 F.3d 141, 145 (2d Cir. 1995). And the Court also
finds that the common law presumption of access attaches. Id. at 146; see also Nixon v. Warner
Commc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 602 (1978). Nevertheless, in balancing competing considerations
against the presumption of access, the Court finds that the redactions are narrowly tailored to
properly guard the privacy interests of the individuals referenced in the Defendant's submission
and in the corresponding exhibits.
finds that the common law presumption of access attaches. Id. at 146; see also Nixon v. Warner
Commc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 602 (1978). Nevertheless, in balancing competing considerations
against the presumption of access, the Court finds that the redactions are narrowly tailored to
properly guard the privacy interests of the individuals referenced in the Defendant's submission
and in the corresponding exhibits.
The Defendant is hereby ORDERED to docket the redacted documents and
corresponding exhibits.
corresponding exhibits.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 14, 2020
New York, New York
Dated: December 14, 2020
New York, New York
ALISON J. NATHAN
United States District Judge
United States District Judge
2
DOJ-OGR-00001971
DOJ-OGR-00001971
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document