DOJ-OGR-00019822.jpg
678 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
4
Organizations
3
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
678 KB
Summary
This document is a 'NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE FILING' issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on April 1, 2021. It addresses a 'Notice of Appearance as Substitute Counsel' submitted on March 30, 2021, on behalf of Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell, stating that the filing does not comply with federal and local court rules. The notice lists numerous specific reasons for the defect, ranging from missing acknowledgments and supporting papers to formatting issues like incorrect pagination and font.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON | CHIEF JUDGE |
Mentioned as the Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
|
| CATHERINE O'HAGAN WOLFE | CLERK OF COURT |
Mentioned as the Clerk of Court for the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
|
| Nathan | DC Judge |
Mentioned as a DC Judge for the SDNY court.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Appellant |
The appellant in the case 'United States of America v. Maxwell' on whose behalf a defective filing was submitted.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit | government agency |
The court issuing the 'NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE FILING'.
|
| Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse | courthouse |
The physical location of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
|
| SDNY (NEW YORK CITY) | court |
The District Court where the original case (1:20-cr-330-1) was handled.
|
| United States of America | government agency |
A party in the legal case 'United States of America v. Maxwell'.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2021-03-30
Submission of the 'Notice of Appearance as Substitute Counsel' on behalf of Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell in the referenced case.
Ghislaine Maxwell
Substitute Counsel
2021-04-01
Issuance of a 'NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE FILING' by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the document submitted on March 30, 2021.
Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, New York, NY 10007
Locations (3)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Part of the address for the Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse.
|
|
|
Part of the address for the Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse.
|
|
|
Location associated with the SDNY court.
|
Relationships (2)
Short Title: United States of America v. Maxwell
Notice of Appearance as Substitute Counsel, on behalf of the Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell was submitted
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,936 characters)
Case 21-58, Document 30, 04/01/2021, 3068130, Page1 of 2
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10007
Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10007
DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON
CHIEF JUDGE
CHIEF JUDGE
Date: April 01, 2021
Docket #: 21-770
Short Title: United States of America v. Maxwell
Docket #: 21-770
Short Title: United States of America v. Maxwell
CATHERINE O'HAGAN WOLFE
CLERK OF COURT
CLERK OF COURT
DC Docket #: 1:20-cr-330-1
DC Court: SDNY (NEW YORK
CITY)DC Docket #: 1:20-cr-330-
1
DC Court: SDNY (NEW YORK
CITY)
DC Judge: Nathan
DC Court: SDNY (NEW YORK
CITY)DC Docket #: 1:20-cr-330-
1
DC Court: SDNY (NEW YORK
CITY)
DC Judge: Nathan
NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE FILING
On March 30, 2021 the Notice of Appearance as Substitute Counsel, on behalf of the Appellant
Ghislaine Maxwell was submitted in the above referenced case. The document does not comply
with the FRAP or the Court's Local Rules for the following reason:
Ghislaine Maxwell was submitted in the above referenced case. The document does not comply
with the FRAP or the Court's Local Rules for the following reason:
____ Failure to submit acknowledgment and notice of appearance (Local Rule 12.3)
____ Failure to file the Record on Appeal (FRAP 10, FRAP 11)
____ Missing motion information statement (T-1080 - Local Rule 27.1)
____ Missing supporting papers for motion (e.g, affidavit/affirmation/declaration) (FRAP 27)
____ Insufficient number of copies (Local Rules: 21.1, 27.1, 30.1, 31.1)
____ Improper proof of service (FRAP 25)
____ Missing proof of service
____ Served to an incorrect address
____ Incomplete service (Anders v. California 386 U.S. 738 (1967))
____ Failure to submit document in digital format (Local Rule 25.1)
____ Not Text-Searchable (Local Rule 25.1, Local Rules 25.2), click here
for instructions on how to make PDFs text searchable
____ Failure to file appendix on CD-ROM (Local Rule 25.1, Local Rules 25.2)
____ Failure to file special appendix (Local Rule 32.1)
____ Defective cover (FRAP 32)
____ Incorrect caption (FRAP 32)
____ Wrong color cover (FRAP 32)
____ Docket number font too small (Local Rule 32.1)
____ Incorrect pagination, click here for instructions on how to paginate PDFs
(Local Rule 32.1)
____ Incorrect font (FRAP 32)
____ Failure to file the Record on Appeal (FRAP 10, FRAP 11)
____ Missing motion information statement (T-1080 - Local Rule 27.1)
____ Missing supporting papers for motion (e.g, affidavit/affirmation/declaration) (FRAP 27)
____ Insufficient number of copies (Local Rules: 21.1, 27.1, 30.1, 31.1)
____ Improper proof of service (FRAP 25)
____ Missing proof of service
____ Served to an incorrect address
____ Incomplete service (Anders v. California 386 U.S. 738 (1967))
____ Failure to submit document in digital format (Local Rule 25.1)
____ Not Text-Searchable (Local Rule 25.1, Local Rules 25.2), click here
for instructions on how to make PDFs text searchable
____ Failure to file appendix on CD-ROM (Local Rule 25.1, Local Rules 25.2)
____ Failure to file special appendix (Local Rule 32.1)
____ Defective cover (FRAP 32)
____ Incorrect caption (FRAP 32)
____ Wrong color cover (FRAP 32)
____ Docket number font too small (Local Rule 32.1)
____ Incorrect pagination, click here for instructions on how to paginate PDFs
(Local Rule 32.1)
____ Incorrect font (FRAP 32)
DOJ-OGR-00019822
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document