DOJ-OGR-00009388.jpg
447 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
4
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
447 KB
Summary
This document is an excerpt from a legal proceeding transcript, filed on February 24, 2022, detailing a Q&A session. Edelstein questions a witness about the identity of 'Catherine Conrad,' specifically investigating if two individuals with that name, one identified as 'Juror No. 1,' are the same person. The discussion also covers the firm's knowledge regarding Juror No. 1's identity and the involvement of Theresa Trzaskoma in related inquiries.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Edelstein | Questioner |
Asking questions in a legal proceeding
|
| Catherine Conrad |
Subject of inquiry; two individuals with this name are being investigated to determine if they are the same person. O...
|
|
| Theresa Trzaskoma |
Mentioned as someone who gives names and was potentially asked about a suspended New York attorney
|
|
| Juror No. 1 | Juror |
Identified as 'Catherine with middle initial M. Conrad'; responses to voir dire were discussed
|
| Unnamed Witness | Witness/Answerer |
Providing answers to Edelstein's questions
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
The entity responsible for transcribing the legal proceeding
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-02-24
A question-and-answer session (likely a deposition or court testimony) where Edelstein questions a witness about the identity of 'Catherine Conrad,' specifically whether two individuals with that name, one being 'Juror No. 1,' are the same person. The discussion includes the role of Theresa Trzaskoma and the firm's awareness of information regarding Juror No. 1's identity and responses to voir dire.
Implied to be within the Southern District, possibly New York
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in relation to a 'suspended New York attorney'
|
Relationships (4)
Edelstein is questioning the witness in a legal proceeding.
The document states 'Juror No. 1 was Catherine with middle initial M. Conrad', indicating they are either the same person or one instance of Catherine Conrad is Juror No. 1.
The witness is questioned about asking Theresa Trzaskoma about an attorney and about suggesting investigative steps to her.
The firm was 'in possession of the information showing that Juror No. 1 was Catherine with middle initial M. Conrad'.
Key Quotes (5)
"Catherine Conrad, you have another Catherine Conrad. Can you take some simple steps to try to investigate and look to see whether they're the same people? Can you do that?"Source
— Edelstein
(Questioning the witness about investigating the identity of two people named Catherine Conrad.)
DOJ-OGR-00009388.jpg
Quote #1
"Did you ask Theresa Trzaskoma what's the middle initial for the suspended New York attorney?"Source
— Edelstein
(Questioning the witness about a specific investigative step regarding Theresa Trzaskoma and an attorney.)
DOJ-OGR-00009388.jpg
Quote #2
"You were aware, were you not, that your firm was in possession of the information showing that Juror No. 1 was Catherine with middle initial M. Conrad, correct?"Source
— Edelstein
(Questioning the witness about their firm's knowledge regarding Juror No. 1's identity.)
DOJ-OGR-00009388.jpg
Quote #3
"No, I was not aware of that."Source
— Unnamed Witness
(Responding to Edelstein's question about awareness of Juror No. 1's identity.)
DOJ-OGR-00009388.jpg
Quote #4
"No. We discussed Juror No. 1's responses to the voir dire,"Source
— Unnamed Witness
(Responding to Edelstein's question about suggesting steps to determine if the Catherine Conrads are the same person, indicating a discussion about voir dire responses.)
DOJ-OGR-00009388.jpg
Quote #5
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,492 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 1616-2 Filed 02/24/22 Page 99 of 130
A-5784
327
C2GFDAU3
Edelstein
1 Catherine Conrad, you have another Catherine Conrad. Can you
2 take some simple steps to try to investigate and look to see
3 whether they're the same people? Can you do that?
4 A. Yes.
5 Q. And how about this: Can you look to see if they have a
6 similar middle initial? Do you think that that increases the
7 likelihood that you're going to narrow the chances that it's
8 the same people? Would you agree with me that that's the case?
9 A. I mean, if you have the tools. I guess I'm not quite sure
10 what you're asking. If you're doing an investigation, yes, you
11 can look to see whether they have the same middle initial.
12 Q. Did you ask Theresa Trzaskoma what's the middle initial for
13 the suspended New York attorney?
14 A. No, I did not.
15 Q. Did you -- well, withdrawn. You were aware, were you not,
16 that your firm was in possession of the information showing
17 that Juror No. 1 was Catherine with middle initial M. Conrad,
18 correct?
19 A. No, I was not aware of that.
20 Q. So are you telling me that when Theresa Trzaskoma gives you
21 these two different names or two similar names, Catherine
22 Conrad and Catherine Conrad, you didn't suggest to her any
23 steps that she could take to try to determine whether it's the
24 same person?
25 A. No. We discussed Juror No. 1's responses to the voir dire,
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00009388
A-5784
327
C2GFDAU3
Edelstein
1 Catherine Conrad, you have another Catherine Conrad. Can you
2 take some simple steps to try to investigate and look to see
3 whether they're the same people? Can you do that?
4 A. Yes.
5 Q. And how about this: Can you look to see if they have a
6 similar middle initial? Do you think that that increases the
7 likelihood that you're going to narrow the chances that it's
8 the same people? Would you agree with me that that's the case?
9 A. I mean, if you have the tools. I guess I'm not quite sure
10 what you're asking. If you're doing an investigation, yes, you
11 can look to see whether they have the same middle initial.
12 Q. Did you ask Theresa Trzaskoma what's the middle initial for
13 the suspended New York attorney?
14 A. No, I did not.
15 Q. Did you -- well, withdrawn. You were aware, were you not,
16 that your firm was in possession of the information showing
17 that Juror No. 1 was Catherine with middle initial M. Conrad,
18 correct?
19 A. No, I was not aware of that.
20 Q. So are you telling me that when Theresa Trzaskoma gives you
21 these two different names or two similar names, Catherine
22 Conrad and Catherine Conrad, you didn't suggest to her any
23 steps that she could take to try to determine whether it's the
24 same person?
25 A. No. We discussed Juror No. 1's responses to the voir dire,
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00009388
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document