DOJ-OGR-00025225.jpg
474 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Internal report/review
File Size:
474 KB
Summary
This internal report details issues concerning Mr. Epstein, including a recommendation for his housing with another inmate accused of a sex offense, which was not implemented. It highlights significant inaccuracies in a Psychology Services Intake Screening from July 8, 2010, where Mr. Epstein's prior convictions for prostitution-related offenses were misreported, and his race was erroneously identified. The document underscores the critical need for accurate documentation.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Epstein | Inmate |
Subject of a housing recommendation, subject of a Psychology Services Intake Screening, previously convicted of Solic...
|
| She |
Entered a Psychology Services Intake Screening into PDS-BEMR on July 8, 2010, and selected the No Sexual Offense Conv...
|
|
| another inmate | Inmate |
Accused of committing a sex offense, potentially to be housed with Mr. Epstein.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology Services Branch, Central Office | Government agency |
Reviewed a consult and recommendation regarding Mr. Epstein's housing.
|
| PDS-BEMR | System/Database |
System where a Psychology Services Intake Screening was entered.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2010-07-08
A Psychology Services Intake Screening for Mr. Epstein was entered into PDS-BEMR. The document contained three typographical errors, including incorrectly marking 'No Sexual Offense Convictions' and erroneously identifying Mr. Epstein as a 'Black male'.
Relationships (2)
A recommendation was made for Mr. Epstein to be housed with another inmate who had also been accused of committing a sex offense, though this did not occur.
She entered Mr. Epstein's Psychology Services Intake Screening into PDS-BEMR.
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,265 characters)
Page 981
reviewed the consult and recommendation from the Psychology Services Branch, Central Office that Mr. Epstein be housed with another inmate who had also been accused of committing a sex offense. There is no evidence this information was considered beyond this e-mail, and Mr. Epstein was never housed with another inmate charged or convicted of a sexual offense.
(b)(5)
4. Documentation Accuracy: (b)(7)(A)
(b)(7)(A)
It is critical that all descriptions of the incident accurately
reflect objective evidence.
(b)(7)(A)
It is critical that all descriptions of the incident accurately
reflect objective evidence.
(b)(7)(A)
(b)(5); (b)(7)(A) Although the incident
report was later expunged, inmates frequently experience significant stress when they
contemplate the potential consequences associated with findings of guilt.
report was later expunged, inmates frequently experience significant stress when they
contemplate the potential consequences associated with findings of guilt.
(b)(6); (b)(7)(C) entered a Psychology Services Intake Screening into PDS-BEMR on
July 8, 2010. The document has three typographical errors. She selected the No Sexual
Offense Convictions check box when, in fact, Mr. Epstein was previously convicted of
Solicitation of Prostitution and Procuring a Person Under the Age of 18 for Prostitution.
Second, Mr. Epstein was erroneously identified as a Black male in this document.
Finally, there is one instance where he was mistakenly referred to as (b)(6); (b)(7)(C)
July 8, 2010. The document has three typographical errors. She selected the No Sexual
Offense Convictions check box when, in fact, Mr. Epstein was previously convicted of
Solicitation of Prostitution and Procuring a Person Under the Age of 18 for Prostitution.
Second, Mr. Epstein was erroneously identified as a Black male in this document.
Finally, there is one instance where he was mistakenly referred to as (b)(6); (b)(7)(C)
8
DOJ-OGR-00025225
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document