| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
J.E. / Jeffrey
|
Subject of discussion |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Associational |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Unidentified Speaker 'Q'
|
Entered a location together |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
that man
|
Interaction at a doorway |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Speaker
|
Communicated |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
e:jeeitunes@gmail.com
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Professional inmate staff |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Rodgers
|
Subordinate manager |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional managerial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
him
|
Communication contact |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unidentified Interviewee (A)
|
Recruited recruiter |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Witness (A)
|
Instructed by |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JEFFREY
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
the girls
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | An unidentified speaker describes entering a building. An unidentified man opened the door for th... | Unspecified Residence/Building | View |
| N/A | N/A | First massage incident: JEFFREY received a massage, paid $300. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Second massage incident: 'She' set up another appointment. She and another girl ("the girls") wen... | JEFFREY's apartment | View |
| N/A | N/A | Call from 'She' to JEFFREY's office/cell phone | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing/deposition | Discussion regarding a witness's statements about an address, applications, and timeline of resid... | N/A | View |
| 2019-03-31 | N/A | Possible travel to Paris (referenced as 'maybe Sunday') | Paris | View |
| 2019-03-28 | N/A | Arrival or presence of an unidentified female ('She'). | Unknown | View |
| 2019-03-26 | N/A | Arrival of unidentified female ('she'). | Unknown (possibly Rome or P... | View |
| 2010-07-08 | Intake screening | A Psychology Services Intake Screening for Mr. Epstein was entered into PDS-BEMR. The document co... | N/A | View |
| 2005-04-10 | N/A | An unidentified female ('She') went running and returned to the gym. This activity was reported t... | Gym (unspecified) | View |
| 2005-02-28 | N/A | An unknown person left a message for 'Jeff, uy' regarding an unnamed female's schedule, mentionin... | school | View |
| 1990-01-01 | N/A | Renovation and building projects | Various properties | View |
An email chain from July 30, 2019, involving the Associate Warden of MCC New York. The correspondence discusses work assignments involving 'Marshal' and 'Jackson'. Notably, the Associate Warden comments, 'Ok. Swapped with Epstein drama,' referencing the situation surrounding inmate Jeffrey Epstein shortly before his death. The document is marked confidential.
This document is an excerpt from a transcript or deposition involving Todd Blanche and Ghislaine Maxwell. Maxwell discusses meeting a 16-year-old person, noting that she considered them a 'young child' and 'not an adult' at the time. She also states her belief that another male ('he') did not meet this person until they were 16, and disputes the accuracy of testimony from 14, 15, and 16-year-olds regarding their encounters.
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of witness Alessi (Juan Alessi). The testimony focuses on Alessi driving a woman (implied to be Ghislaine Maxwell) to exclusive spas and country clubs in Palm Beach, including The Breakers, allegedly for the purpose of 'recruiting.' Alessi admits to keeping a Rolodex containing the names of 'repeat woman' and 'massage therapists' who visited the house.
This document is a partial transcript from a legal proceeding, filed on August 10, 2022, discussing a witness's statements regarding her past residences and applications. The conversation involves attorneys Mr. Everdell and Ms. Menninger, and the Court, focusing on discrepancies or clarifications needed about the witness's timeline, particularly her living situation before and after meeting Epstein and moving to New York. The nature of a '302' document, described as a type-up of agents' notes, is also clarified.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 22-1426) filed on 02/28/2023. It features a legal argument between attorneys Mr. Everdell and Ms. Menninger before a Judge regarding jury instructions and the legal definition of 'transportation' for illegal sexual activity. The discussion specifically focuses on a flight to New Mexico involving a victim referred to as 'Jane' and whether the intent of that specific travel leg was for sexual activity.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 22-1426, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell appeal) dated February 28, 2023. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell is discussing a note from the jury with the Judge, arguing that the jurors are distinguishing between a flight *to* New Mexico and a flight *from* New Mexico regarding 'illicit sexual activity.' Everdell states there is no record of a flight from New Mexico and argues about the necessary 'significant or motivating purpose' of the travel required for a guilty verdict.
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Ms. Sternheim argues for the admission of evidence showing the dates a female witness ('she') maintained contact via email with a male subject ('him') to prove a relationship existed after the events in question. The prosecution (Ms. Pomerantz) argues that the witness already admitted to the dates, making the evidence cumulative.
This document is page 27 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Defense attorney Mr. Everdell is arguing before the Judge regarding legal definitions of 'persuasion,' 'inducement,' and 'causation' in relation to interstate travel statutes. The discussion focuses on whether the persuasion must be the direct cause of the travel for the statute to be satisfied.
A page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) involving legal arguments over jury instructions for 'Count Four' (a transportation count). Attorneys Ms. Moe and Ms. Sternheim debate how to address a jury question concerning whether flights to New Mexico can be considered for a charge based on New York Penal Law Section 130.55. The defense (Sternheim) argues the jury is confused about jurisdiction.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Cross-examination of witness Rodgers) filed in August 2022. The testimony establishes that an unnamed female manager (referred to as 'she' and Epstein's 'number 2') was responsible for managing Epstein's properties, renovations, and aviation staff during the 1990s. Specifically, she approved pilot expenses, vacation time, and served as the point of contact for aircraft maintenance issues.
A page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) dated August 10, 2022. During the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers, attorney Mr. Pagliuca objects to a line of questioning, arguing that moving to a smaller apartment does not prove a lack of money. The Court overrules the objection.
This internal report details issues concerning Mr. Epstein, including a recommendation for his housing with another inmate accused of a sex offense, which was not implemented. It highlights significant inaccuracies in a Psychology Services Intake Screening from July 8, 2010, where Mr. Epstein's prior convictions for prostitution-related offenses were misreported, and his race was erroneously identified. The document underscores the critical need for accurate documentation.
This document appears to be a page from James Patterson's book (likely 'Filthy Rich') included in House Oversight Committee records, containing a transcript of an interview with a victim ('V'). The speaker describes receiving significant gifts from a wealthy man (implied to be Epstein), including a car, cash bonuses, and $1,500 worth of Victoria's Secret underwear. The text details a specific sexual assault incident on a massage table where the man 'pushed' the victim over the table while another female (name redacted) was present and naked.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir (likely by Alan Dershowitz) discussing the legal battle of the Tison brothers (Ricky and Raymond) against the death penalty in Arizona. It details the Supreme Court's decision to vacate their death sentences based on a new 'reckless disregard' standard, the subsequent reimposition of the sentence by a trial judge, and the eventual reversal by the Arizona Supreme Court to allow for new evidence. The document is stamped with a House Oversight Bates number, indicating its inclusion in a congressional investigation, likely related to Dershowitz's involvement in the Epstein case.
This document is a forensic log of digital messages exchanged between June 16 and June 17, 2019. The conversation involves Jeffrey Epstein (using the email 'jeeitunes@gmail.com') and a redacted individual discussing 'painkillers,' 'meds,' and whether Epstein's views are influenced by medication. Epstein defends his intellectual stance as 'Bayesian' and notes that an unnamed female ('She') continues to be in contact.
A digital communication log from June 16, 2019, showing a conversation between the email address 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation discusses a strategy to pursue a specific woman ('She'), referencing 'pain killers,' a 'math professor,' and calculating the odds of a romantic relationship. The correspondent reassures the primary user that the woman is 'doomed to be with you.'
This House Oversight document contains a log of electronic messages from March 28, 2019, between an individual using the email 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation discusses a woman named Kathy canceling a trip due to sickness, the redacted individual's presence in Paris with potential travel to the Middle East, and a reference to 'boy George' not being happy about the situation.
This document contains a log of digital messages exchanged on March 28, 2019, between 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an alias for Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation involves travel logistics, an offer of accommodation for Epstein and 'his boys,' and mentions the arrival of an unidentified female on Sunday and a flight to the 'states' on Tuesday. The document appears to be part of a House Oversight Committee investigation.
This document is a digital communication log from March 27, 2019, showing a text message exchange between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias e:jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual. The conversation concerns the travel movements of an unnamed female ('She') to Geneva and Paris, where Epstein states he is staying. The redacted respondent expresses a dislike for texting, prompting Epstein to acknowledge ('Got it') and the respondent to suggest using their cell phone.
This document is a forensic log of text messages exchanged in the early morning of March 27, 2019. The conversation involves the email address 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (often associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual, discussing logistical changes for travel to Geneva and Paris involving an unnamed female ('She'). The logs also mention an individual named 'Miro' who is described as being well-informed on Europe.
This document is a forensic log of digital messages exchanged on March 26, 2019. The conversation takes place between 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an email associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The messages focus on the schedule of an unidentified female ('she') in Paris, with one party asking specific dates for her stay, alongside a cryptic remark stating, 'Sounds like a grand jury.'
This document is a digital forensic log of messages exchanged on March 26, 2019, between 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (a known Jeffrey Epstein alias) and a redacted individual. The conversation coordinates travel logistics across Rome, Monaco, and Paris involving an unidentified female ('she') arriving on Thursday. Notably, the redacted individual offers to send a private plane to pick up the recipient.
This document is a log of digital communications from November 2018 between 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted high-level diplomat or negotiator. The redacted individual reports on a meeting with Turkish President Erdogan, travel to Berlin, and political friction regarding the 'Migration compact' and a parliamentary vote. Epstein responds with a dark joke asking if Erdogan gave the sender an Apple Watch to record future conversations (likely referencing the Jamal Khashoggi investigation rumors from that time).
This document is a log of electronic messages from September 30, 2018, primarily between 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation focuses on discrediting a female witness ('she') by discussing medications that cause memory loss and 'false memories,' specifically questioning her recollection of a lie detector test relative to her mother's funeral. The participants exchange URLs to articles from Pharmacy Times and ResearchGate to support this narrative.
A text message log from February 23, 2017, between 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an alias often linked to Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation discusses a third party named 'Bill' who 'intervened' to mandate a 6-month period, with clarification that 'it's not firing.' The user 'jeeitunes' notes the organization ('the org') has changed during their 3-year absence.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | JEFFREY | she | $300.00 | Payment for massage in $100.00 bills. | View |
Content discussed as potential hearsay; dates are the primary interest.
She left a message on JEFFREY's cell phone (same number she has currently) telling her that she needed to call back as soon as possible. She did not return her call as she did not know who these people were. A few minutes later, [redacted] received a call from a JEFFREY [redacted] cell phone.
The recruiter told the interviewee that the client would offer more money for sex.
An associate referred to as 'she' called the witness 'A' and told her that 'they were going to New York'.
'She' was the point of contact for any issues regarding the planes.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity