DOJ-OGR-00010025.jpg

400 KB

Extraction Summary

5
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 400 KB
Summary

This document is an excerpt from a legal proceeding, likely a deposition or court transcript, featuring a direct examination by 'Brune' of a speaker identified as 'C2GFDAU1'. The discussion revolves around a past court event where a judge had to restart jury deliberations due to a juror's illness, which coincided with Mr. Rosenbaum having to leave. The witness explains why they did not raise a particular issue with the Court at an earlier time.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Brune Examiner/Attorney
Conducting direct examination of the witness.
C2GFDAU1 Witness/Deponent
Answering questions during direct examination.
Mr. Rosenbaum Individual involved in the case
Had to leave due to illness, which was a factor in the timing of jury deliberations.
judge Judicial officer
Had to restart jury deliberations.
juror Juror
Suffered an illness or health condition.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
Court reporting agency for the proceedings.
Court government agency
The judicial body where the events took place and with whom issues might be raised.

Timeline (3 events)

Judge had to restart jury deliberations the next week.
court
A juror suffered an illness or health condition.
Mr. Rosenbaum had to leave due to illness.

Locations (1)

Location Context
Part of the name of the court reporting agency, implying the jurisdiction.

Relationships (2)

Brune professional C2GFDAU1
Brune is conducting a direct examination of C2GFDAU1, indicating a legal professional relationship.
Mr. Rosenbaum professional/case-related C2GFDAU1
C2GFDAU1 discusses Mr. Rosenbaum's departure and its implications for the court proceedings, suggesting they are involved in the same legal matter.

Key Quotes (3)

"And you were present in court when the judge had to restart jury deliberations the next week, correct?"
Source
— Brune (Questioning the witness about their presence during a significant court event.)
DOJ-OGR-00010025.jpg
Quote #1
"Was that when Mr. Rosenbaum had to leave?"
Source
— C2GFDAU1 (Clarifying the timing of Mr. Rosenbaum's departure in relation to the jury deliberations.)
DOJ-OGR-00010025.jpg
Quote #2
"I did not believe there was an issue. Had I believed there was one, I would have raised it immediately with the Court. I certainly is not a benefit that I waited until Mr. Rosenbaum had taken ill. If I believed it was so, I would have let the"
Source
— C2GFDAU1 (Explaining the rationale for not raising an issue with the Court earlier, linking it to Mr. Rosenbaum's illness.)
DOJ-OGR-00010025.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,235 characters)

Case 2:20-cv-00838-APG-DJA Document 164-2 Filed 03/24/22 Page 57 of 3030
A-5742
285
C2GFDAU1
Brune - direct
1 them to do, I believe.
2 Q. And that would have included working late at night,
3 correct?
4 A. That is for sure.
5 Q. And you were present in court when the judge had to restart
6 jury deliberations the next week, correct?
7 A. Yes.
8 Q. Because of a juror's illness, correct, or health condition?
9 A. Was that when Mr. Rosenbaum had to leave?
10 Q. Correct.
11 A. Yes.
12 Q. And there were still alternates left at that point in time,
13 correct?
14 A. There were.
15 Q. More than one?
16 A. There were a whole row of alternates. I don't know how
17 many, but at least four.
18 Q. Exactly. Did you think at that point in time that you
19 might want to raise with the Court, hey, there's this issue out
20 here, we don't know one way or the other, but it's important so
21 wouldn't you like to know?
22 A. I did not believe there was an issue. Had I believed there
23 was one, I would have raised it immediately with the Court. I
24 certainly is not a benefit that I waited until Mr. Rosenbaum
25 had taken ill. If I believed it was so, I would have let the
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00010025

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document