This document is an excerpt from a legal proceeding, likely a deposition or court transcript, featuring a direct examination by 'Brune' of a speaker identified as 'C2GFDAU1'. The discussion revolves around a past court event where a judge had to restart jury deliberations due to a juror's illness, which coincided with Mr. Rosenbaum having to leave. The witness explains why they did not raise a particular issue with the Court at an earlier time.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Brune | Examiner/Attorney |
Conducting direct examination of the witness.
|
| C2GFDAU1 | Witness/Deponent |
Answering questions during direct examination.
|
| Mr. Rosenbaum | Individual involved in the case |
Had to leave due to illness, which was a factor in the timing of jury deliberations.
|
| judge | Judicial officer |
Had to restart jury deliberations.
|
| juror | Juror |
Suffered an illness or health condition.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Court reporting agency for the proceedings.
|
| Court | government agency |
The judicial body where the events took place and with whom issues might be raised.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Part of the name of the court reporting agency, implying the jurisdiction.
|
"And you were present in court when the judge had to restart jury deliberations the next week, correct?"Source
"Was that when Mr. Rosenbaum had to leave?"Source
"I did not believe there was an issue. Had I believed there was one, I would have raised it immediately with the Court. I certainly is not a benefit that I waited until Mr. Rosenbaum had taken ill. If I believed it was so, I would have let the"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,235 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document