This document is a partial transcript from a court proceeding dated August 10, 2022, discussing legal arguments related to factual records, employer practices, and the admissibility of evidence. Key points include an objection to Government Exhibit 761, a Professional Children's School application for Jane, due to unverified financial guarantor information, and the Court's ruling on the relevance of Mr. Epstein's alleged financial assistance to a witness's family. The discussion also touches upon legal precedents for adoptive business records.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the court proceeding, making rulings and statements.
|
| MS. STERNHEIM | Counsel |
Speaker in the court proceeding.
|
| MS. MENNINGER | Counsel |
Speaker in the court proceeding, discussing an exhibit and an objection.
|
| Jane | Applicant |
Subject of a Professional Children's School application (Government Exhibit 761).
|
| Lieberman |
Mentioned in the context of legal arguments: 'reasons your Honor is articulating for Lieberman'.
|
|
| Mr. Epstein |
Allegedly provided financial assistance to 'the witness or her family'.
|
|
| MR. ROHRBACH | Counsel |
Speaker in the court proceeding, discussing business records.
|
| witness | Witness |
Mentioned in relation to Mr. Epstein providing financial assistance to 'the witness or her family'.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Professional Children's School | School |
Subject of an application (Government Exhibit 761) for Jane.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Entity responsible for transcribing the court proceedings.
|
"I think we're on the same page in terms of the law and in terms of what is the factual record with respect to the employer's practice at the time of their filing any information provided by employees."Source
"Your Honor, may I briefly address something?"Source
"Government Exhibit 761 was offered, it was a Professional Children's School application for Jane. I elicited testimony from the offer award that he did not verify the information pertaining, for example, to the financial guarantor, and I objected to the admission of that for the same reasons your Honor is articulating for Lieberman."Source
"So I overruled that objection because, what seemed to me, the relevance was that the witness or her family was indicating that Mr. Epstein was providing financial assistance at the time, whether or not he was providing financial assistance at the time."Source
"I would also note, your Honor, that in addition to the verification line of business records cases, there is another line of cases of adoptive business records which say that if a company receives a record created by an outsider and integrates it into their files and relies on it, it becomes a record of that business. I haven't so far"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,491 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document