Professional Children's School
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Mr. Kane
|
Knowledgeable witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Applicant |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Paul Kane
|
Employee |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-01-01 | N/A | Digitization of paper student files at Professional Children's School. | Professional Children's School | View |
EFTA00031259.pdf
This document is a Q&A script for the examination of Paul Kane, Director of Finance at Professional Children's School, used in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecution uses Kane to authenticate a student application record (GX 761) from the early 1990s as a business record. The key evidence highlighted is that 'JE' (Jeffrey Epstein) was listed on the application as the person financially responsible for the tuition of a student moving to New York from West Palm Beach, Florida.
EFTA00027433.pdf
This document contains a series of internal emails between SDNY prosecutors from November to December 2020, outlining a 'to-do' list and agenda for the upcoming trial (likely Ghislaine Maxwell's). The tasks include reviewing 'GM emails' in Relativity, identifying witnesses from Interlochen and the Professional Children's School, coordinating with the Palm Beach Police Department (PBPD) regarding evidence from the Palm Beach house search, and scheduling interviews with various witnesses, including Jo Jo Fontanella and individuals who were on flights. The document also references a discussion about 'superseder timing,' implying a superseding indictment was being considered.
EFTA00024238.pdf
This document is a Government Exhibit Index from the trial United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated October 28, 2021. It lists hundreds of exhibits including physical evidence (massage tables, contact books), photographs of victims and properties (Palm Beach, NY, Island), flight logs, financial records, and emails. The index organizes these exhibits by series numbers, providing descriptions, Bates ranges, and production dates for each item.
EFTA00021038.pdf
This document is an 11-page Government Exhibit Index from the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell trial, dated November 23, 2021. It lists hundreds of exhibits including physical evidence (massage tables, hard drives), photographs of victims and properties (Palm Beach, NY, Zorro Ranch, Little St. James), financial records (JPMC), and school records. Notably, the index lists two flight logbooks (GX-661 and GX-662) covering 1991 to 2013, though the specific flight details are not contained within this index document itself.
EFTA00017085.pdf
This document is a formal discovery letter from the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) to the defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, dated August 5, 2020. It lists a comprehensive index of evidence provided to the defense, including financial records from multiple banks (Citibank, Chase, TD Bank, etc.), travel records (flight manifests and airline records), email account records (Oath, Microsoft, Google), and corporate filings (USVI, Delaware). While the document *lists* the existence of flight manifests and financial records, it is an index only and does not contain the specific content (flight paths, transaction amounts) within the document itself.
DOJ-OGR-00017887.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed 08/10/22) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Kane by Mr. Rohrbach. The testimony focuses on establishing the business records foundation for documents from the 'Professional Children's School,' specifically detailing how applications are reviewed, how families are contacted, and confirming that records are retained in the ordinary course of business. Following this testimony, the government moves to offer an exhibit into evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00017885.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a voir dire examination dated August 10, 2022. An attorney, Ms. Menninger, questions a witness, Mr. Kane, about a form from the Professional Children's School. The questioning focuses on whether the school verifies handwritten information added to the form, with Mr. Kane stating that the school's admissions director would contact the family to confirm the details.
DOJ-OGR-00017884.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It records the direct examination of a witness, Kane, by an attorney, Mr. Rohrbach, regarding the authentication of an enrollment application for the Professional Children's School, marked as Government Exhibit 761. An opposing attorney, Ms. Menninger, objects on the grounds of hearsay, but the court overrules the objection.
DOJ-OGR-00017882.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Kane. Kane describes the record-keeping practices of the Professional Children's School, explaining how student permanent files are created and what they contain. The witness states that records are now maintained electronically but were kept as hard copy files in the 1990s and up until about ten years ago.
DOJ-OGR-00017881.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Paul Kane by an attorney, Mr. Rohrbach. Mr. Kane identifies himself as the director of finance for the Professional Children's School in New York City and provides a brief description of the school's history and purpose.
DOJ-OGR-00017813.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a legal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the redirect examination of a witness named Jane, who is questioned about a past application to the Professional Children's School and her understanding of the difference between acting and testifying in court. Jane asserts that testifying in court is real and truthful, unlike acting on television.
DOJ-OGR-00017812.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed 08/10/22) documenting the redirect examination of a witness identified as 'Jane'. The testimony focuses on Jane's height (five-foot-four), grade level (eighth grade), and potential inaccuracies ('fibbing') in applications submitted in 1995 for summer camp and the Professional Children's School.
DOJ-OGR-00017719.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The questioning establishes that Mr. Epstein introduced Jane to Donald Trump and took her to Mar-a-Lago when she claimed to be 14, where she met Trump. The questioning also briefly touches on her schooling and an unspecified "pool house incident".
DOJ-OGR-00017637.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The questioning covers her educational background, including an application to Interlochen at age 13 that was supported by a director from the Professional Children's School. The witness is instructed to read a paragraph from an exhibit, which describes the artistic and charitable activities of a family later identified as the von Trapp family.
DOJ-OGR-00018882.jpg
This document is a partial transcript from a court proceeding dated August 10, 2022, discussing legal arguments related to factual records, employer practices, and the admissibility of evidence. Key points include an objection to Government Exhibit 761, a Professional Children's School application for Jane, due to unverified financial guarantor information, and the Court's ruling on the relevance of Mr. Epstein's alleged financial assistance to a witness's family. The discussion also touches upon legal precedents for adoptive business records.
DOJ-OGR-00015260.jpg
This document is a Plaintiff's response to interrogatories in litigation against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. It itemizes evidence establishing the relationship between Jane Doe and Epstein, including flight logs, phone records from Darren Indyke, and financial records covering rent, tuition, acting classes, and intimate items like underwear. It also alleges that Epstein took photographs of the Plaintiff as a minor without her knowledge, which are currently held by the federal government.
DOJ-OGR-00013298.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. The text details a legal debate regarding the admissibility of Government Exhibit 761, an application to the Professional Children's School for a minor referred to as 'Jane.' The prosecution and the Judge discuss whether the document is admissible as a business record, specifically noting that the application listed Jeffrey Epstein as a financial guarantor, which the Court deemed relevant to show the family's perception of Epstein's financial support.
DOJ-OGR-00014498.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal summation regarding Ms. Menninger, arguing that she misrepresented her personal circumstances. The speaker contrasts her claims of being 'destitute and homeless' with evidence of her living in increasingly larger homes, including one in a gated community. The summation also highlights inconsistencies, such as a guidance counselor's letter describing a 'supportive family' while Ms. Menninger claimed to have trouble communicating with her mother, to undermine her credibility.
DOJ-OGR-00017579.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct testimony of a witness identified as 'Jane.' Jane discusses the psychological impact of her past trauma, stating it ruined her self-worth and ability to trust. She testifies that she moved from Palm Beach to New York City at age 17 and that Jeffrey Epstein paid for her tuition at the Professional Children's School for her senior year of high school.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity