DOJ-OGR-00000449.jpg
572 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
572 KB
Summary
This legal document, dated July 16, 2019, is a filing to Judge Richard M. Berman arguing for Jeffrey Epstein's release on bond. It states that Epstein's brother, Mark, is prepared to secure a release bond exceeding $100 million of his own net worth. The filing also clarifies that the New Mexico Public Safety Department had previously advised Epstein in 2010 that he was not required to register there for his 2008 Florida conviction.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Richard M. Berman | Hon. |
Addressed at the top of the document, likely the presiding judge.
|
| Epstein | Defendant (implied) |
The subject of the legal arguments regarding release conditions, domestic ties, and registration status.
|
| Mark | Brother of Epstein |
Mentioned as being prepared to co-sign and secure a release bond for Epstein using his own net worth.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Court | government agency |
Mentioned in the context of its discretion over Epstein's expenses and its inquiry into his registration status.
|
| New Mexico Public Safety Department | government agency |
Identified as the state agency that formally advised Epstein in August 2010 about his registration status.
|
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in relation to Epstein's registration status and an inquiry from the Court.
|
|
|
Mentioned as the location of Epstein's 2008 conviction.
|
Key Quotes (2)
"you are not required to register with the State of New Mexico ... for your 2008 Florida conviction of Procuring Person Under 18 for Prostitution."Source
— New Mexico Public Safety Department
(Quoted from a formal advisement sent to Epstein in August 2010.)
DOJ-OGR-00000449.jpg
Quote #1
"own net worth"Source
— Unknown (from 7/12/19 Letter)
(Describing the value of the release bond Epstein's brother Mark was prepared to secure.)
DOJ-OGR-00000449.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,175 characters)
Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 24 Filed 07/16/19 Page 5 of 9
Hon. Richard M. Berman
July 16, 2019
Page 5
July 16, 2019
Page 5
during the July 15 argument, Epstein will agree to any monetary
condition – consistent with his Sixth Amendment need to retain counsel
and pay ordinary expenses, which, at the Court’s discretion, could be
subject to supervision by a Court-appointed trustee – that collateralizes
his assets as a condition of release.
condition – consistent with his Sixth Amendment need to retain counsel
and pay ordinary expenses, which, at the Court’s discretion, could be
subject to supervision by a Court-appointed trustee – that collateralizes
his assets as a condition of release.
Fourth, to the extent the government complains Epstein lacks
meaningful domestic ties, we clarify and emphasize that his brother
Mark, a U.S. resident, stands prepared to co-sign and secure a release
bond in the full amount of his “own net worth,”4 which exceeds $100
million – tangible proof of his certainty that Epstein will appear as
necessary.
meaningful domestic ties, we clarify and emphasize that his brother
Mark, a U.S. resident, stands prepared to co-sign and secure a release
bond in the full amount of his “own net worth,”4 which exceeds $100
million – tangible proof of his certainty that Epstein will appear as
necessary.
Fifth, in response to the Court’s inquiry about Epstein’s New
Mexico registration status, the state’s Public Safety Department formally
advised in August 2010 that “you are not required to register with the
State of New Mexico ... for your 2008 Florida conviction of Procuring
Person Under 18 for Prostitution.” Nonetheless, in an abundance of
Mexico registration status, the state’s Public Safety Department formally
advised in August 2010 that “you are not required to register with the
State of New Mexico ... for your 2008 Florida conviction of Procuring
Person Under 18 for Prostitution.” Nonetheless, in an abundance of
4 7/12/19 Ltr. 6 (footnote omitted).
DOJ-OGR-00000449
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document