This document details the legal proceedings against Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, focusing on the scope and limitations of Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It explains how a co-conspirator clause was broadened to cover the entire United States, Epstein's 2008 Florida plea, his 2019 indictment in New York for sex trafficking, and his subsequent death, followed by Maxwell's indictment as his co-conspirator.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Epstein | Defendant / Co-conspirator |
Pled guilty in Florida state court, indicted in Southern District of New York, died while incarcerated.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Co-conspirator / Defendant |
Indicted in Southern District of New York for actions as co-conspirator of Epstein.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| State Attorney's office in Florida |
NPA not binding on this office.
|
|
| United States Attorney's offices |
NPA lacked recitation regarding binding nature on these offices.
|
|
| Southern District of Florida |
Location where original prosecution limits applied, and where some conduct occurred.
|
|
| Southern District of New York |
Location where Epstein and Maxwell were indicted.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Broader geographic scope of co-conspirator clause.
|
|
|
Location of state court plea, State Attorney's office, and some alleged conduct.
|
|
|
Location of alleged conduct and indictments.
|
"This co-conspirator clause, containing no geographic limitation on where in the United States it could be enforced, was actively negotiated at the same time as the terms of Epstein's protection for his own criminal prosecution, which was expressly limited to a bar on prosecutions in the Southern District of Florida only"Source
"A previous version of the co-conspirator language limited it to the Southern District of Florida before it was amended to refer more broadly to the "United States,""Source
"The NPA also contained an express recitation that it was not binding on the State Attorney's office in Florida (App.30), but it contained no such recitation setting forth that it was not binding on other United States Attorney's offices."Source
"The NPA did not pose an impediment to this indictment because Epstein's protection therein had been limited to charges brought in the Southern District of Florida."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,721 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document