HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023720.jpg

1.81 MB

Extraction Summary

5
People
8
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Draft article / essay / book chapter
File Size: 1.81 MB
Summary

This document is a draft of an essay titled 'Is Shame Necessary?' by Jennifer Jacquet, intended for the forthcoming book 'Future Science' edited by Max Brockman (August 2011). The text provides Jacquet's academic biography and begins an analysis of shame's function in society, using the 2008 financial crisis and Citigroup's attempted jet purchase as examples of behavior lacking shame. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was collected as part of a congressional investigation.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Jennifer Jacquet Author
Researcher holding a postdoctoral fellowship at University of British Columbia; author of the essay 'Is Shame Necessa...
Max Brockman Editor
Editor of the forthcoming book 'Future Science' where this essay will appear.
Barack Obama President of the United States
Quoted regarding Citigroup's jet purchase and executive bonuses.
R. Boyd Researcher
Cited in footnote regarding the evolution of human cooperation.
P. J. Richerson Researcher
Cited in footnote regarding the evolution of human cooperation.

Organizations (8)

Name Type Context
Vintage Press
Publisher of the book 'Future Science'.
Cornell University
Where Jennifer Jacquet received her master's degree.
University of British Columbia
Where Jennifer Jacquet earned her PhD and holds a fellowship; location of the Mathematics Department.
Sea Around Us Project
A joint collaboration Jacquet works with.
Pew Charitable Trusts
Collaborator on the Sea Around Us Project.
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology
Institution where Jacquet has colleagues for her research.
Citigroup
Financial institution mentioned for proposing a jet purchase after receiving taxpayer funds.
House Oversight Committee
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.

Timeline (3 events)

2008
Financial crisis involving executive bonuses and government bailout.
USA
Financial executives Government
2008
Foreclosure of more than 3 million American homes.
USA
Homeowners
Early 2009
Citigroup proposes buying a corporate jet shortly after receiving bailout funds.
USA

Locations (2)

Location Context
Location of Vintage Press.
Location where President Obama gave an interview.

Relationships (1)

Jennifer Jacquet Professional Max Brockman
Jennifer Jacquet is the author of an essay in a book edited by Max Brockman.

Key Quotes (2)

"They should know better."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023720.jpg
Quote #1
"shameful."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023720.jpg
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,299 characters)

Forthcoming (August 2011) Future Science edited by Max Brockman, Vintage Press, New York.
Is Shame Necessary?
Jennifer Jacquet
Jennifer Jacquet graduated with a master's degree in environmental economics from Cornell University in 2004 and earned a PhD in 2009 from the University of British Columbia, where she now holds a postdoctoral fellowship. As part of the Sea Around Us Project, a joint collaboration between the university and the Pew Charitable Trusts, she researches market-based conservation initiatives related to seafood and other natural resources. With colleagues from the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology and UBC’s Mathematics Department, she is currently conducting a series of games and experiments to study the effects of honor and shame on cooperation.
Financial executives received almost $20 billion in bonuses in 2008 amid a serious financial crisis and a $245 billion government bailout. In 2008, more than 3 million American homes went into foreclosure because of mortgage blunders those same executives helped facilitate. Citigroup proposed to buy a $50-million corporate jet in early 2009, shortly after receiving $45-billion in taxpayer funds. Days later, President Obama took note in an Oval Office interview. About the jet, he said, “They should know better.” And the bonuses, he said, were “shameful.”
What is shame’s purpose? Is shame still necessary? These are questions I’m asking myself. After all, it is not just bankers we have to worry about. Most social dilemmas exhibit a similar tension between individual and group interest. Energy, food, and water shortages, climate disruption, declining fisheries, increasing antibiotic resistance, the threat of nuclear warfare—all can be characterized as tragedies of the commons, in which the choices of individuals conflict with the greater good.
Balancing group- and self-interest has never been easy, yet human societies display a high level of cooperation. To attain that level, specialized traits had to evolve, including such emotions as shame.¹ Shame is what is supposed to occur after an individual fails to cooperate
_____________________
¹ R. Boyd & P. J. Richerson, “Culture and the evolution of human cooperation,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 364: 3281-88 (2009).
1
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023720

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document