Jennifer Jacquet
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Brockman
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional social |
1
|
1 |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023720.jpg
This document is a draft of an essay titled 'Is Shame Necessary?' by Jennifer Jacquet, intended for the forthcoming book 'Future Science' edited by Max Brockman (August 2011). The text provides Jacquet's academic biography and begins an analysis of shame's function in society, using the 2008 financial crisis and Citigroup's attempted jet purchase as examples of behavior lacking shame. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was collected as part of a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029973.jpg
An email chain from August 4, 2011, between Jennifer Jacquet and Jeffrey Epstein. The conversation begins with financial advice where Epstein (and 'John') suggest Jacquet take money from 'Edge' instead of Epstein. The conversation shifts to a discussion on financial markets which devolves into sexual wordplay involving terms like 'feminized,' 'gyneconomist,' and 'speculumator,' culminating in a joke about borrowing a device from 'Clinton.' Jacquet also mentions a project transfer at UBC involving someone named Richard.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-08-04 | Received | Edge | Jennifer Jacquet | $0.00 | Epstein suggests Jacquet take money from 'edge'... | View |
Re:
Yuck. Maybe borrow one from Clinton?
Re:
i would need my speculumator to gauge accurately
Re:
Well, you're the gyneconomist. Better get to work.
Re:
they are being feminized.
Re:
Richard and I have already been in touch about the transfer to the project I work with here at UBC... p.s. What the heck is happening to the financial markets...
Re:
john and i agree that maybe you shoudl take money from edge. as opposed to me ,, if it helps
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity