An internal email exchange within the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated March 11, 2019. Staff members discuss a presentation requested by 'Laura' regarding campaign finance cases involving the NRA, PIC (Presidential Inaugural Committee), and GEP (Global Energy Producers), noting ties to the President (POTUS). When asked if a redacted individual needs to recuse themselves ('step out'), the response provided is 'Epstein OK'.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Russell | USANYS Staff/Prosecutor |
Asked to present on campaign finance cases
|
| Laura | Supervisor/USANYS |
Asked Russell and the sender to present on cases
|
| POTUS | President of the United States |
Mentioned as having ties to the cases being discussed (NRA, PIC, GEP)
|
| Epstein | Subject of discussion |
Mentioned in the response 'Epstein OK', potentially referring to Jeffrey Epstein or a specific attorney/recusal matter
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| USANYS |
United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York (Sender/Receiver affiliation)
|
|
| NRA |
National Rifle Association (Campaign finance case subject)
|
|
| PIC |
Presidential Inaugural Committee (Campaign finance case subject)
|
|
| GEP |
Global Energy Producers (Campaign finance case subject)
|
"Russell and I have been asked by Laura to present on our campaign finance cases."Source
"We're doing NRA, PIC and GEP, all of which have POTUS ties."Source
"Do we need to ask [Redacted] to step out?"Source
"Epstein OK"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (486 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document