This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness, likely named Dubin. The witness is questioned about their observations of the relationship between Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein, stating that they lived in the same house but finding the term 'relationship' hard to define. An attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, repeatedly objects to the questioning, with the court overruling one objection and sustaining another.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell |
Subject of questioning regarding her interactions and relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.
|
|
| Jeffrey Epstein |
Subject of questioning regarding his interactions and relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Attorney |
Makes objections during the questioning, citing 'Lack of foundation'.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the testimony, ruling on objections.
|
| The Witness | Witness |
Person being questioned about their observations of Maxwell and Epstein.
|
| Dubin | Witness |
Mentioned in the header, likely the last name of the witness undergoing cross-examination.
|
| AJN | Judge |
Mentioned in the case number '1:20-cr-00330-AJN', likely the initials of the presiding judge.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
| DOJ | Government agency |
Implied by the document identifier 'DOJ-OGR-00016856', likely referring to the Department of Justice.
|
"It's hard to define, I think, "relationship." But they were living in the same house."Source
"Your Honor, objection. Lack of foundation."Source
"Overruled. You may answer."Source
"Sustained."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,499 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document