| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Eve Andersson
|
Unknown association |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Social |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Romantic |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Dubin's Family
|
Family |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Frances Jardine
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Witness victim interaction |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Alleged abuse denial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Acquaintance |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of witness Dubin regarding sexualized massages and relationship timeline. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of witness Dubin regarding media reports of Epstein's flight logs | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Air travel on Epstein's planes by Dubin and her family. | Epstein's airplanes | View |
| N/A | N/A | End of dating relationship between Dubin and Epstein; transition to friendship. | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal testimony | A direct examination of a witness named Dubin was conducted as part of Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | A witness (Dubin) is questioned under direct examination about their past relationship with Mr. E... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | Cross-examination of witness Dubin in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court testimony (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) involving cross-examination of witness Dubin. | Southern District (implied NY) | View |
| 2005-01-14 | N/A | Flight TIST to PBI | TIST to PBI | View |
| 2004-10-08 | N/A | Flight JFK to PBI with Dubin family | PBI | View |
| 2001-03-22 | N/A | Flight 1477 from LGA to PBI | LGA to PBI | View |
| 1995-01-01 | Birth | The first child of witness Dubin was born. | N/A | View |
| 1994-01-01 | Trip | Witness Dubin visited Jeffrey Epstein's house in Palm Beach. | Palm Beach | View |
| 1994-01-01 | N/A | Flight to DCA (Washington D.C.) and return trip on the same day. | DCA Airport / Washington D.C. | View |
| 1994-01-01 | N/A | Time period focused on during questioning regarding Maxwell's role in Epstein's life. | Unknown | View |
| 1994-01-01 | Residence | Witness Dubin was living in Paris. | Paris | View |
| 1992-06-18 | Flight | Flight from TEB to PBI. | Between TEB and PBI | View |
| 1992-05-25 | Flight | Flight from PBI to TEB. | Between PBI and TEB | View |
| 1983-01-01 | Personal relationship | The witness dated Mr. Epstein during the period from approximately 1983 through 1991. | N/A | View |
A photograph (evidence tag EFTA00003497) showing a male subject, likely Sean Dubin, standing inside a stone grotto or fountain niche next to a large statue of Neptune holding a trident. The setting appears to be an outdoor garden area with ivy growing on the stone walls.
This document is a court transcript of the cross-examination of a witness, Dr. Dubin, filed on August 10, 2022. An attorney's question about conversations between Dr. Dubin and Ghislaine Maxwell regarding Jeffrey Epstein is successfully objected to by Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning then shifts to Dr. Dubin's memory, with the witness admitting it is 'very hard to remember anything far back'.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Dr. Dubin, by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on a specific flight log entry (916) and a passenger named "Jane." Dr. Dubin states he cannot fully read the entry and does not recall the flight or meeting anyone named Jane on it.
This document is a flight log page (No. 114) signed by pilot David Rodgers covering flights from January 8, 2005, to March 14, 2005. It details movements of aircraft N909JE and N908JE to locations including Palm Beach, St. Thomas, JFK, Columbus (Ohio), and San Diego. The logs list passengers including Jeffrey Epstein (JE), Ghislaine Maxwell (GM), Sarah Kellen (SK), Jean-Luc Brunel (JLB), and others, with several names redacted.
This document is a handwritten flight log page (No. 111) signed by pilot David Rodgers, covering flights from August 3, 2004, to October 13, 2004. It records movements of Jeffrey Epstein's aircraft (N908JE and N909JE) and helicopter training in Texas. Passengers include Jeffrey Epstein (JE), Ghislaine Maxwell (GM), Sarah Kellen (SK), the Dubin family, and several others. There is a consistent redaction of a specific passenger's name on nearly every flight involving Epstein.
This document is a flight log page from March and April 2001 documenting flights on Jeffrey Epstein's Gulfstream (N909JE) and a Cessna (N908GM). Significant entries show Virginia Roberts ('VR') traveling with Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and scientist Marvin Minsky to Santa Fe on March 29, 2001. The log also lists numerous other passengers including Banu Kucukkoylu, Alexis Wallace, and Henry Jarecki, and includes a redacted name on the March 31st flight.
This document is a flight log page from pilot David Rodgers for March and April 1998. It primarily details flights for passenger "JE" (likely Jeffrey Epstein) on aircraft N908JE, with frequent co-passenger "GM" (likely Ghislaine Maxwell) and numerous other individuals including Paul Mellon, Oliver Sachs, and George Schultz. The log records trips to various US locations and the Bahamas, and also includes entries for the pilot's simulator training and training flights conducted for other individuals.
This document is a transcript of a court summation by Ms. Menninger, likely for the defense in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. Menninger challenges the reliability of witness memories, citing manipulation and the passage of time, while contrasting the credibility of expert witnesses Dr. Loftus and Dr. Rocchio. She concludes by introducing the six counts against Maxwell, including conspiracy, and tells the jury they have the opportunity to acquit her.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing the end of the cross-examination of a witness, Dr. Dubin. Attorney Ms. Moe asks a final question about medical conditions, which is objected to by attorney Mr. Pagliuca but allowed by the judge. After a brief answer, the testimony concludes, and the court excuses Dr. Dubin.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Dubin. The questioning, conducted by Ms. Moe, focuses on the witness's understanding of the relationship between Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein during the 1990s (specifically 1994-2000), asking about Maxwell's role in managing Epstein's personal life and whether they had an open relationship. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca repeatedly objects to the questions based on lack of foundation.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness, likely named Dubin. The witness is questioned about their observations of the relationship between Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein, stating that they lived in the same house but finding the term 'relationship' hard to define. An attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, repeatedly objects to the questioning, with the court overruling one objection and sustaining another.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Dubin. The questioning focuses on the frequency of Dubin's visits to Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach house between 1994 and 2004, which the witness estimates was about four times per year. Dubin denies any knowledge of the day-to-day activities in the house and confirms personal details from that era, such as living in Paris in 1994 and the birth of their first child in 1995.
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of Dr. Dubin. An attorney questions Dr. Dubin about his knowledge of a woman named Eva who was reportedly dating or close to Mr. Epstein between 1994 and 2004, which Dr. Dubin cannot recall. The questioning concludes with Dr. Dubin explicitly denying ever having been in a group sexual encounter or a sexualized massage with an individual referred to as 'Jane'.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022. An attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, is questioning a witness, Dr. Dubin, about a flight list from a document labeled 662-RR. Dr. Dubin confirms that she, her husband, and her children (with one name misspelled) were on a flight from TIST to PBI.
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, showing the direct examination of a witness, Dr. Dubin. An attorney questions Dr. Dubin about whether he knows a person identified in exhibit GX-12, using the alias "Jane" to protect the person's identity. Dr. Dubin states that he does not recall ever meeting this individual.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Dubin. The testimony focuses on confirming that Mr. Epstein dated a woman named Frances Jardine in 1994 and discusses a specific flight record indicating Dubin, Epstein, and Jardine flew to Washington D.C. (DCA) and returned the same day. The witness recalls Frances but claims not to recall the specific trip.
This is a court transcript from a case dated August 10, 2022, detailing a procedural discussion between two attorneys, Mr. Pagliuca and Ms. Comey, and the judge. They are arranging the submission of a new, less-redacted version of flight logs (Exhibit 662-R), agreeing to mark it as '662-RR' for clarity, which will replace a previously offered version.
This document is a court transcript from a legal proceeding on August 10, 2022. In the transcript, an attorney, Ms. Moe, informs the court that Mr. Pagliuca will be offering a redacted government exhibit that both parties have already agreed upon. This is a procedural discussion about the admission of evidence during a trial or hearing.
This document is a transcript page from the trial United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), dated August 10, 2022. It details procedural discussions between the defense (Mr. Pagliuca) and the prosecution (Ms. Comey, Ms. Moe) regarding the admissibility of flight records and the submission of legal applications. The court sustains an objection based on Federal Rules of Evidence 401 and 403 during the direct examination of a witness named Dubin.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a legal argument between defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca and prosecutor Ms. Moe regarding the admissibility of questioning a witness (indicated as 'Dubin' in the header) about media reports concerning flight logs. Ms. Moe clarifies that the official flight records in evidence are sealed/redacted and differ from public versions. Mr. Pagliuca argues that inaccurate media reports have influenced perceptions of his client (Maxwell) and that the witness can testify to these inaccuracies.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal discussion after a witness, Dr. Dubin, is excused. Attorney Ms. Moe argues against questioning a witness based on their memory of media reports concerning flight records, suggesting the witness should be shown the actual records instead. Attorney Mr. Pagliuca begins to justify the relevance of his questioning to the judge by stating that the flight records were leaked to the media.
This page is a transcript from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), specifically the direct examination of a witness named Dubin (likely Eva Dubin). Prosecutor Mr. Pagliuca asks the witness if they have seen media reports regarding Jeffrey Epstein's flight records and whether they believed them to be accurate. Defense attorney Ms. Moe objects twice asking for more specificity, and the Judge sustains the objection, asking Pagliuca to define the timeframe and quantity of the records being discussed.
This document is an excerpt from a legal transcript, filed on August 10, 2022, pertaining to a direct examination. It captures a discussion between 'THE COURT' and 'MR. PAGLIUCA' regarding questions about an unnamed 'she' and 'her children' in relation to Mr. Epstein, specifically concerning her knowledge of him and their presence with him. The Court directs the questioning to move on after sustaining a question.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) involving a legal argument between attorneys Ms. Moe and Mr. Pagliuca before the Judge. The discussion concerns limiting the scope of questioning for a witness (identified in the header as Dubin) regarding 'sexualized massages' and misconduct involving Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Mr. Pagliuca argues that the witness's lack of knowledge regarding inappropriate activity is relevant to why she continued dating 'him' (Epstein).
This document is a page from a court transcript (Sidebar) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Prosecutor Ms. Moe objects to the Defense's line of questioning for witness Dubin, arguing against the relevance of 'uncharged conduct' regarding the defendant or Epstein. Moe also argues there is no foundation to suggest Dubin was present for sexualized massages involving a victim identified as 'Jane'.
Questioning regarding knowledge of Frances Jardine and a 1994 flight to Washington D.C.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity