DOJ-OGR-00010037.jpg
424 KB
Extraction Summary
7
People
4
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
424 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript dated March 23, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Brune. The questioning centers on a previous statement made by Ms. Trzaskoma to the court, where she offered to submit a letter about newly discovered facts. The questioner probes whether a specific 'Westlaw report' was one of these facts.
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Brune | Witness |
A witness under direct examination, being questioned about a statement made by Ms. Trzaskoma.
|
| judge | Judicial Officer |
Mentioned as having given people an option to submit a letter.
|
| MR. DAVIS | Attorney |
An individual, likely an attorney, who is addressing Mr. Wooten and the Court.
|
| Mr. Wooten |
Addressed by Mr. Davis, possibly a clerk or opposing counsel, asked to provide an exhibit.
|
|
| your Honor | Judge |
A formal address to the presiding judge by Mr. Davis and Ms. Trzaskoma.
|
| Ms. Trzaskoma |
A person whose statement to the Court is the subject of the questioning.
|
|
| Ms. Brune | Witness |
The witness being addressed directly by the questioner.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Government | government agency |
Mentioned in the context of "Government Exhibit 9".
|
| THE COURT | Judicial Body |
The presiding court, addressed by Mr. Davis.
|
| Westlaw | company |
Mentioned as the source of a report that was attached to a submission.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding.
|
Timeline (1 events)
Relationships (2)
The document is a transcript of a formal legal questioning of a witness (Brune) by a questioner (likely an attorney).
Ms. Trzaskoma made a formal statement to the Court, addressing the judge as 'Your Honor' and offering to submit a letter.
Key Quotes (2)
"Your Honor, we were not aware of the facts that have come to light, and I think if your Honor deems it appropriate, we can submit a letter"Source
— Ms. Trzaskoma
(A quote from Ms. Trzaskoma, read by the questioner during the examination of Brune, regarding an offer to provide more information to the court.)
DOJ-OGR-00010037.jpg
Quote #1
"The question is, one of the facts that came to light that you attached was the Westlaw report, correct?"Source
— Questioner
(The final question posed to the witness, Ms. Brune, seeking to confirm if a Westlaw report was part of the newly discovered facts.)
DOJ-OGR-00010037.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,495 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00083-PAE-Nm Document 1643-20 Filed 03/23/22 Page 696 of 13030
A-5754
A-5754
C2grdau2
Brune - direct
297
1 A. What she did was what the judge had sort of given people
2 the option of saying that they would do, which is that she said
3 that she would submit a letter, and then we worked very hard to
4 submit a letter that was accurate.
5 MR. DAVIS: Mr. Wooten, could I have Government
6 Exhibit 9, page 12, please.
7 Could I have a moment, your Honor?
8 THE COURT: Take your time.
9 Q. Can you see it up there?
10 A. Yes.
11 Q. Do you see where Ms. Trzaskoma, in response to the Court's
12 inquiry, said, "Your Honor, we were not aware of the facts that
13 have come to light, and I think if your Honor deems it
14 appropriate, we can submit a letter"? Correct?
15 A. She did say that.
16 Q. One of the facts that had come to light was the very same
17 suspension opinion that she had found before voir dire ever
18 started, correct?
19 A. I think what she is trying to convey there --
20 Q. That's not my question.
21 A. I'm sorry. If you could say it again.
22 Q. I'm just asking a very straightforward question, Ms. Brune.
23 A. I know it, but it's not a yes or no, I don't think.
24 Q. Sure it is. The question is, one of the facts that came to
25 light that you attached was the Westlaw report, correct? You
Brune - direct
297
1 A. What she did was what the judge had sort of given people
2 the option of saying that they would do, which is that she said
3 that she would submit a letter, and then we worked very hard to
4 submit a letter that was accurate.
5 MR. DAVIS: Mr. Wooten, could I have Government
6 Exhibit 9, page 12, please.
7 Could I have a moment, your Honor?
8 THE COURT: Take your time.
9 Q. Can you see it up there?
10 A. Yes.
11 Q. Do you see where Ms. Trzaskoma, in response to the Court's
12 inquiry, said, "Your Honor, we were not aware of the facts that
13 have come to light, and I think if your Honor deems it
14 appropriate, we can submit a letter"? Correct?
15 A. She did say that.
16 Q. One of the facts that had come to light was the very same
17 suspension opinion that she had found before voir dire ever
18 started, correct?
19 A. I think what she is trying to convey there --
20 Q. That's not my question.
21 A. I'm sorry. If you could say it again.
22 Q. I'm just asking a very straightforward question, Ms. Brune.
23 A. I know it, but it's not a yes or no, I don't think.
24 Q. Sure it is. The question is, one of the facts that came to
25 light that you attached was the Westlaw report, correct? You
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00010037
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document