This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning attempts to refresh Carolyn's memory about a prior statement she allegedly made to the FBI in 2007 concerning a chef. Carolyn disputes the attorney's characterization of the statement, claiming the document she was shown mentioned her taking off her panties for $400 but did not mention a chef.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Carolyn | Witness |
The person being cross-examined in the court transcript.
|
| MR. PAGLIUCA | Attorney |
The attorney conducting the cross-examination of Carolyn.
|
| MS. COMEY | Attorney |
An attorney who raises an objection during the cross-examination.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
The presiding judge in the legal proceeding.
|
| chef | Chef |
Mentioned in a question from Mr. Pagliuca regarding a prior statement Carolyn allegedly made to the FBI.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| FBI | government agency |
Mentioned in a question about a prior statement the witness, Carolyn, allegedly made.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding, listed at the bottom of the page.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as a location where the witness allegedly sat during an event she previously described to the FBI.
|
"Objection, your Honor. Isn't this refreshing recollection at this point?"Source
"You might be wrong on the paragraph you had me read. It mentioned nothing about a chef. It mentioned about me taking off my panties to get $400."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,182 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document