DOJ-OGR-00018772.jpg

495 KB

Extraction Summary

5
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 495 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning attempts to refresh Carolyn's memory about a prior statement she allegedly made to the FBI in 2007 concerning a chef. Carolyn disputes the attorney's characterization of the statement, claiming the document she was shown mentioned her taking off her panties for $400 but did not mention a chef.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Carolyn Witness
The person being cross-examined in the court transcript.
MR. PAGLIUCA Attorney
The attorney conducting the cross-examination of Carolyn.
MS. COMEY Attorney
An attorney who raises an objection during the cross-examination.
THE COURT Judge
The presiding judge in the legal proceeding.
chef Chef
Mentioned in a question from Mr. Pagliuca regarding a prior statement Carolyn allegedly made to the FBI.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
FBI government agency
Mentioned in a question about a prior statement the witness, Carolyn, allegedly made.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding, listed at the bottom of the page.

Timeline (2 events)

2007
A prior event, referenced in questioning, where Carolyn allegedly made a statement to the FBI. The questioning begins with "Isn't it true that, in 2007 --".
2022-08-10
Cross-examination of witness Carolyn by Mr. Pagliuca regarding a prior statement to the FBI.
Courtroom (implied)

Locations (1)

Location Context
Mentioned as a location where the witness allegedly sat during an event she previously described to the FBI.

Relationships (3)

MR. PAGLIUCA professional Carolyn
Mr. Pagliuca is an attorney conducting a cross-examination of Carolyn, who is a witness in a legal proceeding.
MS. COMEY professional Carolyn
Ms. Comey, an attorney, objects to a question posed to Carolyn, suggesting she is acting in a legal capacity aligned with the witness.
MR. PAGLIUCA professional MS. COMEY
They are opposing counsel in a court proceeding, as one questions the witness and the other objects.

Key Quotes (2)

"Objection, your Honor. Isn't this refreshing recollection at this point?"
Source
— MS. COMEY (Making an objection to Mr. Pagliuca's line of questioning.)
DOJ-OGR-00018772.jpg
Quote #1
"You might be wrong on the paragraph you had me read. It mentioned nothing about a chef. It mentioned about me taking off my panties to get $400."
Source
— Carolyn (Responding to Mr. Pagliuca's question about her prior statement to the FBI, correcting his summary of the paragraph she was shown.)
DOJ-OGR-00018772.jpg
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,182 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 174 of 264 1612
LC7Cmax6 Carolyn - cross
1 A. I don't recall if it was the second visit or a couple into
2 going there.
3 MR. PAGLIUCA: We can show the witness 005, page 2,
4 paragraph 4, please.
5 Q. Isn't it true that, in 2007 --
6 MS. COMEY: Objection, your Honor. Isn't this
7 refreshing recollection at this point?
8 THE COURT: Yes. If you want to point her to the
9 paragraph and make it larger, that's fine.
10 MR. PAGLIUCA: Sure. Fourth paragraph, please enlarge
11 that.
12 BY MR. PAGLIUCA:
13 Q. Have you had a chance to look at the fourth paragraph?
14 A. I'm reading it right now, sir.
15 Q. Okay.
16 A. Okay.
17 Q. Does reading that paragraph refresh your recollection that
18 you told the FBI that you sat in the kitchen and the chef asked
19 if you were hungry?
20 A. You might be wrong on the paragraph you had me read. It
21 mentioned nothing about a chef. It mentioned about me taking
22 off my panties to get $400.
23 Q. We should be at 005, page 2, paragraph 4.
24 THE COURT: You mean the fourth full paragraph?
25 MR. PAGLIUCA: Correct.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018772

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document