DOJ-OGR-00011663.jpg
548 KB
Extraction Summary
8
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
4
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
548 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing procedural discussions in a criminal case. An attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, requests and receives permission from the government and court to share Dr. Rocchio's testimony with two other witnesses, Dr. Dietz and Dr. Loftus. The court also sets a deadline of the upcoming Saturday for the government to provide its order-of-witness list and confirms with both the prosecution (Ms. Comey) and defense (Ms. Sternheim) that no plea offers have been communicated.
People (8)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. COMEY | Attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, likely representing the government. Responds to the court regarding the witness list and p...
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the transcript, presiding over the proceedings, asking questions and making rulings.
|
| MR. PAGLIUCA | Attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, raising an issue regarding sequestration and requesting to share witness testimony.
|
| Dr. Rocchio | Witness |
Mentioned as a witness whose testimony Mr. Pagliuca wants to provide to other witnesses.
|
| Dr. Dietz | Witness |
Mentioned as a potential recipient of Dr. Rocchio's testimony.
|
| Dr. Loftus | Witness |
Mentioned as a potential recipient of Dr. Rocchio's testimony.
|
| MR. ROHRBACH | Attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, stating that the government is fine with Mr. Pagliuca's request.
|
| Ms. Sternheim | Attorney |
Addressed by the court to confirm that no plea offers were communicated.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the document as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A court hearing where procedural matters were discussed, including witness testimony sharing, witness list deadlines, and plea offers.
Courtroom (unspecified)
Relationships (4)
Both are addressed by the court regarding the defense's position, suggesting they are part of the defense team.
Both speak on behalf of "the government," indicating they are part of the prosecution team.
Dr. Dietz is a witness who may need to address issues from Dr. Rocchio's testimony.
Dr. Loftus is a witness who may need to address issues from Dr. Rocchio's testimony.
Key Quotes (5)
"I was hoping to be able to provide a copy of Dr. Rocchio's testimony to either Dr. Dietz or Dr. Loftus, because I anticipate there may be issues that come up that they need to address during their testimony."Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA
(Requesting a limited exclusion from Rule 615 (sequestration of witnesses).)
DOJ-OGR-00011663.jpg
Quote #1
"That's fine with the government, your Honor."Source
— MR. ROHRBACH
(Agreeing to Mr. Pagliuca's request on behalf of the government.)
DOJ-OGR-00011663.jpg
Quote #2
"When may I have an order-of-witness list?"Source
— THE COURT
(Asking the government for a deadline to submit the witness list.)
DOJ-OGR-00011663.jpg
Quote #3
"We would propose by Saturday, your Honor?"Source
— MS. COMEY
(Proposing a deadline for submitting the order-of-witness list.)
DOJ-OGR-00011663.jpg
Quote #4
"None were communicated, your Honor."Source
— MS. COMEY
(Responding to the court's question about whether any plea offers were communicated to the defense.)
DOJ-OGR-00011663.jpg
Quote #5
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,324 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 739 Filed 08/10/22 Page 42 of 43 42
LBNAMAXTps
LBNAMAXTps
1 Protection Act and 615. Why don't you both look at it, confer,
2 see if you can come to agreement, and if not, put in a letter.
3 MS. COMEY: Thank you, your Honor.
4 THE COURT: Thank you.
5 MR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, one other issue on
6 sequestration. I was hoping to be able to provide a copy of
7 Dr. Rocchio's testimony to either Dr. Dietz or Dr. Loftus,
8 because I anticipate there may be issues that come up that they
9 need to address during their testimony. And so for that
10 purpose I would ask for a limited exclusion from Rule 615 for
11 those witnesses.
12 MR. ROHRBACH: That's fine with the government, your
13 Honor.
14 THE COURT: Thank you. This is why I asked. Make
15 sure we're on the same page.
16 Anything else in that regard?
17 MS. COMEY: Not from the government, your Honor.
18 THE COURT: When may I have an order-of-witness list?
19 MS. COMEY: We would propose by Saturday, your Honor?
20 THE COURT: OK. And, as I always do, I ask at the
21 final pretrial conference if any plea offers were communicated
22 to the defense.
23 MS. COMEY: None were communicated, your Honor.
24 THE COURT: And Ms. Sternheim, that's accurate; none
25 were communicated?
2 see if you can come to agreement, and if not, put in a letter.
3 MS. COMEY: Thank you, your Honor.
4 THE COURT: Thank you.
5 MR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, one other issue on
6 sequestration. I was hoping to be able to provide a copy of
7 Dr. Rocchio's testimony to either Dr. Dietz or Dr. Loftus,
8 because I anticipate there may be issues that come up that they
9 need to address during their testimony. And so for that
10 purpose I would ask for a limited exclusion from Rule 615 for
11 those witnesses.
12 MR. ROHRBACH: That's fine with the government, your
13 Honor.
14 THE COURT: Thank you. This is why I asked. Make
15 sure we're on the same page.
16 Anything else in that regard?
17 MS. COMEY: Not from the government, your Honor.
18 THE COURT: When may I have an order-of-witness list?
19 MS. COMEY: We would propose by Saturday, your Honor?
20 THE COURT: OK. And, as I always do, I ask at the
21 final pretrial conference if any plea offers were communicated
22 to the defense.
23 MS. COMEY: None were communicated, your Honor.
24 THE COURT: And Ms. Sternheim, that's accurate; none
25 were communicated?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00011663
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document