HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016462.jpg

Extraction Summary

9
People
4
Organizations
3
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: News article (new york post)
File Size:
Summary

A 2018 New York Post article reporting on a January 2011 court hearing where the Manhattan DA's office, represented by Jennifer Gaffney, requested a downgrade of Jeffrey Epstein's sex-offender status from Level 3 to Level 1. The request stunned Judge Ruth Pickholz, who noted she had never seen prosecutors make such a downward argument for such a troubling case. The document is stamped as part of a House Oversight Committee review.

People (9)

Name Role Context
Jeffrey Epstein Subject
Described as 'pedophile billionaire', 'pervert', and 'financier'. Subject of sex-offender registry hearing.
Rebecca Rosenberg Author
Journalist/Author of the article
Larry Celona Author
Journalist/Author of the article
Susan Edelman Author
Journalist/Author of the article
Isabel Vincent Author
Journalist/Author of the article
Jennifer Gaffney Assistant DA
Then-deputy chief of Cyrus Vance Jr.’s sex-crimes unit. Argued to downgrade Epstein's sex-offender status.
Cyrus Vance Jr. District Attorney
Head of the DA's office; Gaffney's superior.
Ruth Pickholz Judge
Manhattan Supreme Court Justice who presided over the hearing and criticized the DA's office.
Florida U.S. Attorney Prosecutor
Handled the sprawling sex-crime investigation in Florida; Gaffney admitted not speaking to them.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
Manhattan DA's office
Prosecutor's office criticized for siding with Epstein.
The Post
Newspaper that obtained the records (New York Post).
Manhattan Supreme Court
Venue of the hearing.
House Oversight Committee
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.

Timeline (1 events)

January 2011
Court hearing where Assistant DA Jennifer Gaffney requested a downgrade of Epstein's sex-offender status.
Manhattan Supreme Court

Locations (3)

Location Context
Jurisdiction of the DA and location of the court.
State maintaining the sex-offender registry.
Location of the U.S. Attorney investigation.

Relationships (2)

Jennifer Gaffney Professional (Subordinate/Superior) Cyrus Vance Jr.
Gaffney described as 'then-deputy chief of Cyrus Vance Jr.’s sex-crimes unit'
Manhattan DA's office Legal/Favored Treatment Jeffrey Epstein
Article states the office 'went to bat' for Epstein and requested leniency.

Key Quotes (3)

"there are no real victims here"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016462.jpg
Quote #1
"I have never seen the prosecutor’s office do anything like this"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016462.jpg
Quote #2
"I have done many [cases] much less troubling than this one where [prosecutors] would never make a downward argument like this."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016462.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,186 characters)

METRO
Manhattan DA sided with pedophile billionaire after botching investigation
By Rebecca Rosenberg, Larry Celona, Susan Edelman and Isabel Vincent
December 1, 2018 | 8:47pm | Updated
[Photo of Jeffrey Epstein]
Jeffrey Epstein
The Manhattan DA’s office once went to bat for billionaire pervert Jeffrey Epstein, after botching a review of his sex crimes and swallowing his lawyers’ claim that “there are no real victims here,” records obtained by the Post show.
Assistant DA Jennifer Gaffney, then-deputy chief of Cyrus Vance Jr.’s sex-crimes unit, in January 2011 asked a Manhattan judge to downgrade Epstein’s status in the New York sex-offender registry from the most-dangerous Level 3 to least-restrictive Level 1.
The judge was stunned.
“I have never seen the prosecutor’s office do anything like this,” Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Ruth Pickholz told Gaffney. “I have done many [cases] much less troubling than this one where [prosecutors] would never make a downward argument like this.”
Pressed by the judge, Gaffney admitted that she never spoke to the Florida U.S. Attorney who handled a sprawling sex-crime investigation into the financier.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016462

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document