The Post
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Manhattan District Attorney
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
John M. Browning
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Defendant's Counsel
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Manhattan District Attorney’s Office
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Manhattan District Attorney
|
Adversarial investigative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
District Attorney's Office
|
Adversarial investigative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
First Department
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sue Edelman
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
District Attorney
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Media subject |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defendant's current counsel
|
Communication |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Deanna
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Manhattan District Attorney's Office
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Motion to unseal appellate briefs | New York Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Motion by 'The Post' to unseal or produce appellate briefs. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Post's Motion | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Appeal | New York Courts | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Post’s Efforts to Obtain the Appellate Briefing | First Department | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Post's motion to unseal appellate briefs. | New York Court | View |
| 2019-12-21 | N/A | The Post moved the Court for an order unsealing appellate briefs (Note: The text says 2019, but c... | New York Court | View |
| 2019-01-04 | N/A | The Post filed a letter withdrawing the December 21 Motion. | Court | View |
| 2019-01-04 | N/A | The Post voluntarily withdrew its December 21 Motion to resolve a procedural dispute. | New York Court | View |
| 2019-01-04 | N/A | Filing of a letter withdrawing the December 21 Motion to address procedural issues. | Court | View |
| 2018-12-21 | N/A | The Post filed a motion requesting an order unsealing appellate briefs with victim names redacted. | Manhattan (implied court) | View |
| 2018-12-21 | N/A | The Post filed a motion to unseal appellate briefs. | Manhattan (implied) | View |
| 2018-12-20 | N/A | Epstein's lawyer states he needs to review the brief before taking a position. | N/A | View |
| 2018-12-01 | N/A | The Post published an article titled 'Manhattan DA sided with pedophile billionaire after botchin... | New York | View |
| 2014-01-01 | N/A | Pulitzer Prize for public service awarded to The Post and The Guardian. | USA | View |
| 2013-06-06 | N/A | The Washington Post publishes the PRISM scoop. | USA | View |
| 0021-12-01 | N/A | Date of the original motion filed by the Post, which was subsequently withdrawn. | New York Court | View |
EFTA00027261.pdf
An email sent on August 11, 2019, sharing a link to a New York Post article about Jeffrey Epstein's alleged recruiters. The sender highlights a specific claim from the article that Ghislaine Maxwell is cooperating with authorities. The identities of the sender and recipients are redacted.
EFTA00026781.pdf
This document is an email chain from 2016 (forwarded in 2018) discussing legal proceedings and media coverage regarding Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Key contents include a link to a Page Six article about Epstein's relationships with young women, and a discussion of legal attachments such as a complaint against Maxwell (noting Judge Sweet denied her motion to dismiss) and filings in a CVRA case. A lead attorney is added to the correspondence following a meeting.
EFTA00020687.pdf
This document is an email chain from September 10, 2019, discussing media efforts to unseal records in the case US v. Tartaglione (16-cr-832). Al-Amyn Sumar of the New York Times Legal Department circulated a letter sent to the Court on behalf of the NYT and reporter Ben Weiser, joining the NY Post and Daily News in opposing sealing. The context relates to Nicholas Tartaglione, who was Jeffrey Epstein's cellmate at the MCC during Epstein's first suicide attempt/assault.
EFTA00013724.pdf
This document is an editorial clipping criticizing Jeffrey Epstein's high-profile legal team (Dershowitz, Starr, Goldberger) for their defense strategies amidst solicitation charges and civil lawsuits. It details allegations involving a 14-year-old girl in 2005 and notes that police found evidence of school schedules and transcripts in Epstein's home, contradicting claims that he was unaware of the victims' ages. The article mocks the lawyers' attempts to frame the lawsuits as merely money-driven.
EFTA00009877.pdf
An email chain between legal professionals discussing ongoing litigation involving Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The correspondence references a meeting held on February 29, 2016, where documents including a defamation complaint against Maxwell, CVRA case filings, and a 'redacted 302' (FBI interview) were shared. A later email in the chain from March 8, 2016, highlights a NY Post article about Epstein's continued relationships with young women.
DOJ-OGR-00000331.jpg
This legal document, dated July 12, 2019, is a filing by the U.S. Government arguing for the pretrial detention of the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein. The prosecution refutes the defense's attempt to characterize the alleged crimes as 'simple prostitution,' asserting that under federal law, a minor cannot consent to being exploited, and coercion is not a required element for a child sex trafficking charge. Citing the defendant's history of abuse and past statements minimizing his conduct, the Government concludes that he poses a significant flight risk and danger to the community.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019769.jpg
This document appears to be a page (281) from a book manuscript, likely 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein (inferred from the filename 'Epst' and ISBN 9780451494566), bearing a House Oversight Committee stamp. The text analyzes Edward Snowden's motivations, arguing that he sought fame rather than just whistleblower status, as evidenced by his refusal to remain anonymous despite offers from editors and his specific request for Laura Poitras to film him. It details the timeline of his communications with journalists Gellman, Greenwald, and Poitras in 2013.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019731.jpg
This document is page 243 from a book, likely 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein (indicated by the filename 'Epst' and ISBN), which was produced as evidence for the House Oversight Committee. The text details the critical timeline leading up to June 3 (2013), covering Edward Snowden's flight to Hong Kong, his communications with journalists Laura Poitras and Glenn Greenwald, and the delays caused by 'The Guardian's' due diligence. It speculates on Snowden's motivations for staying in Hong Kong to produce a video, noting that Greenwald and Poitras arrived only hours before Snowden would be marked as missing by the NSA.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019613.jpg
This document is page 125 of a book (likely 'Electile Dysfunction' by Alan Dershowitz, based on the ISBN in the file slug 'Epst_9780451494566') that was produced as part of a House Oversight investigation (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019613). The text discusses the polarizing nature of Edward Snowden's actions, analyzing the legal implications under the Patriot Act and the FISA court. It contrasts the media's celebration of Snowden (citing the Polk and Pulitzer awards) with the condemnation by the Obama administration and intelligence officials. The file slug 'Epst_' suggests this document was part of a production related to Jeffrey Epstein, likely due to Alan Dershowitz's role as his attorney.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019612.jpg
This document is page 124 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' (likely by Edward Jay Epstein), included in a House Oversight Committee production (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019612). The text details Edward Snowden's leaks regarding NSA surveillance, specifically the PRISM program and a FISA warrant issued by Judge Roger Vinson compelling Verizon to share customer records. It discusses the legal framework involving the Patriot Act, the USA Freedom Act, and the role of the FISA court.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019603.jpg
This document is page 115 from a book titled 'The Great Divide' (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the footer code 'Epst_' suggesting an Epstein-related legal production). The text discusses Edward Snowden, comparing the government's 'demonization' of him to the treatment of 1960s NSA defectors Martin and Mitchell. It details a 2014 Lawfare Institute analysis which argued that the majority of Snowden's leaks concerned overseas intelligence operations rather than domestic surveillance.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019598.jpg
This document is page 110 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' (likely by Edward Jay Epstein, indicated by the filename 'Epst_...'). The text analyzes Edward Snowden's defection to Russia, questioning the narrative of him as a whistleblower and suggesting he may have been a tool for Russian intelligence (FSB/KGB) under Putin. The page bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it was part of a Congressional document production.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019216.jpg
This document is a news article printout (likely Washington Post) describing meetings between Donald Trump and various figures regarding healthcare policy and Obamacare reform. It specifically highlights the attendance of Bruce Moskowitz and Marvel CEO Isaac Perlmutter at a meeting, noting the latter's presence was unexplained. It also mentions Cosgrove's criticism of healthcare paperwork and a scheduled meeting with former Governor Tommy Thompson.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031879.jpg
This page contains an analysis of an opinion column written by Prince Turki (likely in the Washington Post). The author of the document notes the ominous tone of Turki's writing, describing him as a skilled diplomat but lacking charm. The text warns that Saudi moderation regarding Israel may be ending due to pressure from the 'Arab street,' culminating in a threatening quote about Israel facing its 'comeuppance.'
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016503.jpg
This document is page 16 of a legal filing submitted by 'the Post' (likely a media organization) arguing against the wholesale sealing of appellate briefs in a case involving Jeffrey Epstein. Citing New York Civil Rights Law and case precedents, the Post argues that the District Attorney should only be permitted to redact the names of victims to protect their identities, rather than keeping the entire record sealed. The document includes a footnote discussing the Post's inability to notify victims directly due to lack of knowledge of their identities.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016500.jpg
This document is page 13 of a legal filing arguing for the unsealing of appellate briefs related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. The text asserts a strong public interest in transparency to understand why the District Attorney's Office, led by DA Vance, argued for lenient treatment of Epstein. It cites various legal precedents regarding the presumption of openness in court records and mentions that Vance has faced criticism for favoring wealthy defendants.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016499.jpg
This document is page 12 of a legal brief filed by 'The Post' (likely the NY Post) arguing for the unsealing of appellate briefs related to Jeffrey Epstein. The text argues that there is 'good cause' to unseal these documents to help the public understand why the Manhattan District Attorney's Office initially argued for Epstein to be registered only as a level one sex offender, suggesting 'undue deference' to a 'dangerous pedophile.' The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016498.jpg
This is page 11 of a legal argument filed by 'The Post' (likely the NY Post) seeking a court order to unseal appellate briefs related to Jeffrey Epstein's sex offender designation. The text argues that despite the Manhattan District Attorney's opposition, the public interest in scrutinizing how prosecutors handled Epstein's case outweighs the reasons for secrecy, provided victims' names are redacted. It cites multiple New York legal precedents supporting the media's right to petition for access to court records.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016497.jpg
This document is page 10 of a legal motion filed by 'The Post' (a media organization) in a New York court. The motion requests the unsealing of appellate briefs related to Jeffrey Epstein's sex-offender registration (SORA) proceedings, with victim names redacted. It details procedural history, including the withdrawal of a previous motion from December 21 to resolve disputes over notifying Florida prosecutors, and notes the Manhattan Assistant District Attorney Friedman Agnifilo's stance on the unsealing.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016496.jpg
This document is page 9 of a legal filing outlining a dispute between 'The Post' and the Manhattan District Attorney's Office regarding the unsealing of appellate briefs related to Jeffrey Epstein. The text highlights that while Epstein's counsel took 'no position' on the unsealing, the DA's office reversed its initial stance of 'not opposing' the motion and subsequently opposed it, arguing that the Post failed to notify prosecutors in Florida. The document includes a footnote disputing the legal necessity of notifying Florida prosecutors.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016495.jpg
This document, likely a legal memorandum submitted to the House Oversight Committee, details 'The Post's' investigation into the Manhattan District Attorney's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. It discusses allegations that ADA Gaffney and DA Cyrus Vance were unduly lenient or negligent regarding Epstein's sex offender registration and describes reporter Sue Edelman's failed December 2018 attempt to obtain sealed appellate briefs regarding the matter.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016492.jpg
This document discusses the legal proceedings surrounding Jeffrey Epstein, specifically focusing on the Manhattan District Attorney's shift in position regarding his sex offender adjudication and the sealing of appeal briefs. It highlights the public controversy and media interest in the perceived lenient handling of Epstein's prosecution in both Florida and New York.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016490.jpg
This document is a legal filing requesting the court to order the District Attorney's Office to provide redacted appellate briefs to 'the Post' while protecting victim anonymity. It details the factual background of Jeffrey Epstein's 2008 conviction and the subsequent disagreement between the NYBSO, which recommended level three sex offender status, and ADA Jennifer Gaffney, who argued for level one status.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016489.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal motion filed by 'The Post' (likely the New York Post) requesting the unsealing of appellate briefs related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. The text highlights that the Manhattan District Attorney's Office initially argued for Epstein to be adjudicated as a 'level one offender' (lowest risk) despite evidence of offenses against underage girls, before changing their position on appeal. The filing argues that the public has a right to know the justifications for this initial leniency and alleges potential prosecutorial missteps and favoritism.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016485.jpg
This document is the Table of Contents for a legal brief filed by 'The Post' (likely a newspaper). The brief argues for the unsealing of appellate briefings related to Jeffrey Epstein's case in the First Department. It outlines sections discussing Epstein's sex crime conviction, media interest in the lenient handling of his case by NY and FL prosecutors, and the legal arguments for public access.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity