DOJ-OGR-00018773.jpg

480 KB

Extraction Summary

6
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 480 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. Mr. Pagliuca questions Carolyn about a statement she made to the FBI in 2007 concerning an incident in a kitchen with a chef, which she confirms. He then asks about a separate visit where a person named Sarah allegedly led her upstairs, which Carolyn denies.

People (6)

Name Role Context
THE COURT Judge
Presiding over the legal proceeding, correcting Mr. Pagliuca on the document reference.
MR. PAGLIUCA Attorney
Conducting a cross-examination of the witness, Carolyn, and referencing a document.
THE WITNESS Witness
Being questioned by Mr. Pagliuca. Later identified as Carolyn.
Carolyn Witness
Being cross-examined about a statement she made to the FBI in 2007 and a second visit involving someone named Sarah.
chef Chef
Mentioned in a question about a 2007 event where he allegedly asked Carolyn if she was hungry.
Sarah
Mentioned in a question as being present on a 'second visit' and allegedly leading Carolyn upstairs.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
FBI government agency
Mentioned as the agency to whom Carolyn gave a statement in 2007.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
Listed at the bottom of the transcript, likely the court reporting service that created the document.

Timeline (3 events)

2007
Carolyn gave a statement to the FBI about sitting in a kitchen where a chef asked if she was hungry.
2022-08-10
Cross-examination of witness Carolyn by Mr. Pagliuca.
Courtroom (implied)
A 'second visit' where Sarah was allegedly present and led Carolyn upstairs.
upstairs

Locations (1)

Location Context
Mentioned as the location where Carolyn sat with a chef in 2007.

Relationships (2)

MR. PAGLIUCA professional Carolyn
Mr. Pagliuca is an attorney cross-examining Carolyn, who is a witness in a court proceeding.
THE COURT professional MR. PAGLIUCA
The Court (judge) is presiding over the proceeding and interacts with Mr. Pagliuca (attorney) to ensure proper procedure is followed.

Key Quotes (3)

"Carolyn, does that refresh your memory that that's what you told the FBI in 2007, that you sat in the kitchen and the chef asked if you were hungry?"
Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA (Questioning the witness about a prior statement to the FBI.)
DOJ-OGR-00018773.jpg
Quote #1
"Isn't it also true that on that second visit, Sarah was there and led you upstairs?"
Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA (Questioning the witness about another event.)
DOJ-OGR-00018773.jpg
Quote #2
"I wasn't led upstairs by anybody."
Source
— Carolyn (The witness's response to Mr. Pagliuca's question about being led upstairs by Sarah.)
DOJ-OGR-00018773.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,155 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 175 of 264 1613
LC7Cmax6 Carolyn - cross
1 THE COURT: That's not what was said.
2 MR. PAGLIUCA: I'm sorry. The fourth line down
3 beginning with "She."
4 THE COURT: That's not there.
5 MR. PAGLIUCA: 3505-005, page 2.
6 THE WITNESS: You're wrong.
7 MR. PAGLIUCA: I'm looking at a paper copy.
8 THE COURT: Why don't you look at your paralegal's
9 screen and make sure you're directing to the right paragraph,
10 please.
11 I think you mean the third full paragraph. Is that
12 what you're looking for?
13 MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes, the third full paragraph.
14 THE COURT: All right. We have that now.
15 Question?
16 MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes, your Honor. I was waiting for the
17 witness to finish.
18 BY MR. PAGLIUCA:
19 Q. Carolyn, does that refresh your memory that that's what you
20 told the FBI in 2007, that you sat in the kitchen and the chef
21 asked if you were hungry?
22 A. Yes.
23 Q. Isn't it also true that on that second visit, Sarah was
24 there and led you upstairs?
25 A. I wasn't led upstairs by anybody.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018773

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document