This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. Mr. Pagliuca questions Carolyn about a statement she made to the FBI in 2007 concerning an incident in a kitchen with a chef, which she confirms. He then asks about a separate visit where a person named Sarah allegedly led her upstairs, which Carolyn denies.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the legal proceeding, correcting Mr. Pagliuca on the document reference.
|
| MR. PAGLIUCA | Attorney |
Conducting a cross-examination of the witness, Carolyn, and referencing a document.
|
| THE WITNESS | Witness |
Being questioned by Mr. Pagliuca. Later identified as Carolyn.
|
| Carolyn | Witness |
Being cross-examined about a statement she made to the FBI in 2007 and a second visit involving someone named Sarah.
|
| chef | Chef |
Mentioned in a question about a 2007 event where he allegedly asked Carolyn if she was hungry.
|
| Sarah |
Mentioned in a question as being present on a 'second visit' and allegedly leading Carolyn upstairs.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| FBI | government agency |
Mentioned as the agency to whom Carolyn gave a statement in 2007.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript, likely the court reporting service that created the document.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as the location where Carolyn sat with a chef in 2007.
|
"Carolyn, does that refresh your memory that that's what you told the FBI in 2007, that you sat in the kitchen and the chef asked if you were hungry?"Source
"Isn't it also true that on that second visit, Sarah was there and led you upstairs?"Source
"I wasn't led upstairs by anybody."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,155 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document