This document is a Notice of Appeal filed on September 3, 2020, on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Maxwell is appealing the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York's decision from September 2, 2020, which denied her motion to modify a protective order. The notice cites several legal precedents to argue that the denial is immediately appealable.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
The defendant in the case, filing a notice of appeal.
|
| Pichler |
Named party in the case citation Pichler v. UNITE.
|
|
| Cohen |
Named party in the case citation Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
|
|
| Brown |
Named party in the case citation Brown v. Maxwell.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | government agency |
The Plaintiff in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
| UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK | government agency |
The court from which the appeal is being made.
|
| United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit | government agency |
The court to which Ghislaine Maxwell is appealing.
|
| UNITE | organization |
Named party in the case citation Pichler v. UNITE.
|
| Minpeco S.A. | company |
Named party in the case citation Minpeco S.A. v. Conticommodity Servs., Inc.
|
| Conticommodity Servs., Inc. | company |
Named party in the case citation Minpeco S.A. v. Conticommodity Servs., Inc.
|
| Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. | company |
Named party in the case citation Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The location of the United States District Court handling the case.
|
"We have jurisdiction under the collateral order doctrine to review the denial of the motion to modify the Protective Order and the denial of the motion to reconsider."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,373 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document