DOJ-OGR-00010162.jpg
483 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
483 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript where a speaker criticizes the past actions of an unnamed woman and her two senior colleagues. The speaker argues they failed to properly investigate or report information to the court, possibly due to exhaustion or intimidation, which the judge later termed a 'tragic misjudgment'. This failure to act ultimately led to the substitution of a juror several days later.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Unnamed female subject ('she') |
The central figure of the speaker's criticism, who allegedly abandoned an inquiry after accumulating information.
|
|
| Unnamed senior colleagues | Seniors |
Two senior colleagues of the unnamed female who decided not to inform the judge about a potential issue.
|
| Your Honor | Judge |
The judge presiding over the case, who referred to a past event as a 'tragic misjudgment'.
|
| Unnamed lawyer | Lawyer |
Mentioned in the context of a judgment a lawyer should not have made in the situation being described.
|
| Unnamed colleagues | Colleagues |
People who were spoken to a day or two after the initial event, who dismissed the name match as a coincidence.
|
| Unnamed new juror | Juror |
A juror who was substituted a few days after the events described.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| the Court | government agency |
Mentioned as the body that should have been informed about the situation.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service that transcribed the proceedings.
|
| Westlaw | company |
Mentioned in the context of a 'Westlaw report' that the two seniors did not know about.
|
Timeline (3 events)
A long trial is mentioned as the context for the events, possibly explaining the exhaustion of the participants.
Court
An unnamed woman and her two senior colleagues decided not to investigate or report information from a Westlaw report to the judge.
A new juror was substituted a few days after the initial failure to report information.
Court
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
A location where the unnamed female subject ('she') is said to have abandoned her inquiry.
|
Relationships (1)
The document states 'she goes along with her two seniors' and questions if it was 'because her seniors cowed her', indicating a subordinate relationship.
Key Quotes (4)
"it can't be her. There is no need to tell the judge. Let's go home, it's been a long day, a long trial."Source
— Unnamed senior colleagues (as described by the speaker)
(The speaker's characterization of the thought process of the two seniors when deciding not to report their findings.)
DOJ-OGR-00010162.jpg
Quote #1
"Your Honor referred to it as a tragic misjudgment, and it was."Source
— CAC3PARC (speaker)
(The speaker is agreeing with the judge's assessment of the failure to report the information.)
DOJ-OGR-00010162.jpg
Quote #2
"Let's just tell the Court and we'll go from there."Source
— CAC3PARC (speaker)
(The speaker is stating what should have been done instead of inaction.)
DOJ-OGR-00010162.jpg
Quote #3
"geez, she has the same name, but it can't be her."Source
— people (as described by the speaker)
(The reaction of colleagues when told about the name match a day or two after the event.)
DOJ-OGR-00010162.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,729 characters)
Case 2:20-cr-00033-RBR-DAEN Document 164-3-20 Filed 03/22/22 Page 64 of 117
A-5907
A-5907
5
CAC3PARC
1 What's always been odd to me is when she gets to the
2 plaza, how quickly she abandons it. And whether it's because
3 she's exhausted at the end of a long trial, whether it's
4 because, as she said, she looked more at this report and she
5 thought it was more complicated, whether it was because her
6 seniors cowed her. But, as your Honor says, the discussion
7 there was superficial and never addressed the information that
8 she had accumulated over the last 12 hours. And she simply
9 goes along. And she goes along with her two seniors who don't
10 know of the Westlaw report, but say to themselves it can't be
11 her. There is no need to tell the judge. Let's go home, it's
12 been a long day, a long trial.
13 Now, we differed back at the time as to whether that
14 was a waiver or not. But there is no doubt that that is not a
15 judgment that a lawyer should have made in that situation.
16 Your Honor referred to it as a tragic misjudgment, and it was.
17 One of two things should have happened. There should
18 have been an investigation, or there should have been someone
19 saying, why me investigate? Let's just tell the Court and
20 we'll go from there. And neither of those things happened.
21 Instead, people went home, they spoke to their colleagues a day
22 or two later, and said, geez, she has the same name, but it
23 can't be her. And nobody said, well, let's do the easy thing
24 and let's tell the Court. As your Honor says, a few days
25 later, we substituted a new juror and nobody thinks to
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
1 What's always been odd to me is when she gets to the
2 plaza, how quickly she abandons it. And whether it's because
3 she's exhausted at the end of a long trial, whether it's
4 because, as she said, she looked more at this report and she
5 thought it was more complicated, whether it was because her
6 seniors cowed her. But, as your Honor says, the discussion
7 there was superficial and never addressed the information that
8 she had accumulated over the last 12 hours. And she simply
9 goes along. And she goes along with her two seniors who don't
10 know of the Westlaw report, but say to themselves it can't be
11 her. There is no need to tell the judge. Let's go home, it's
12 been a long day, a long trial.
13 Now, we differed back at the time as to whether that
14 was a waiver or not. But there is no doubt that that is not a
15 judgment that a lawyer should have made in that situation.
16 Your Honor referred to it as a tragic misjudgment, and it was.
17 One of two things should have happened. There should
18 have been an investigation, or there should have been someone
19 saying, why me investigate? Let's just tell the Court and
20 we'll go from there. And neither of those things happened.
21 Instead, people went home, they spoke to their colleagues a day
22 or two later, and said, geez, she has the same name, but it
23 can't be her. And nobody said, well, let's do the easy thing
24 and let's tell the Court. As your Honor says, a few days
25 later, we substituted a new juror and nobody thinks to
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00010162
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document