This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Menninger, likely for a defense team. Menninger argues that the witness, Juan Alessi, is not credible by pointing out that he reported directly to Epstein, not Ghislaine, and by citing an email between Ghislaine and Sally Markham where Alessi's work was called 'truly awful'. She further undermines his credibility by discussing his inconsistent testimony regarding a household manual and a black address book.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Menninger | Speaker (likely an attorney) |
Mentioned in the header as the person giving the summation.
|
| Juan Alessi | Witness, Employee of Epstein |
The subject of the summation, whose credibility is being questioned. He testified that Epstein was his direct supervi...
|
| Ghislaine | Lady of the house, Supervisor |
Mentioned as a figure of authority in the house and a participant in an email exchange about Mr. Alessi's job perform...
|
| Epstein | Employer, Direct Supervisor |
Mentioned as Mr. Alessi's direct supervisor and employer.
|
| Sally Markham |
Mentioned as a participant in an email exchange with Ghislaine regarding Mr. Alessi's job performance.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting agency that transcribed the proceedings.
|
| government | government agency |
Mentioned as the entity that presented evidence (a quote, an address book) during the trial.
|
Complete text extracted from the document (1,646 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document