Sally Markham
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employee |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Ghislaine
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
gmaxl@mindspring.com (sender)
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
G. Max
|
Employee |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Sally Markham hired as property manager. | Epstein Properties | View |
| N/A | N/A | Creation of the Household Manual (Government Exhibit 606). | Unknown | View |
| 2001-05-25 | Communication | An email was sent from gmaxl@mindspring.com to Sally Markham at 12:05 p.m. | N/A | View |
| 2001-05-25 | N/A | Email sent regarding household staff failures. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00021022.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Document 657 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) addressing the Defendant's (Ghislaine Maxwell) claim that delay in prosecution caused prejudice to her defense. The text argues the defendant failed to prove substantial prejudice but outlines her specific claims regarding lost evidence, including flight records, financial documents, phone records, and property records. It specifically names deceased witnesses the defense claims were unavailable: architects Albert Pinto and Roger Salhi, and property manager Sally Markham.
DOJ-OGR-00018654.jpg
This document is a court transcript page from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Witness Mr. Flatley reads an email dated May 25, 2001, from 'gmax1@mindspring.com' to Sally Markham. The email details specific failures by a staff member named John, including issues with a Mercedes ('black Merc'), a dirty pool deck, technical issues with a computer, and disorganized massage creams in Jeffrey Epstein's ('JE') bathroom.
DOJ-OGR-00015682.jpg
This document is an email thread between Ghislaine Maxwell (G. Max) and Sally Markham from May 2001. Maxwell writes a scathing critique of a staff member named John, listing specific failures regarding the maintenance of a property (likely Palm Beach), including a dirty pool deck, missing items in the 'black Merc' (Mercedes), a burnt-out bulb on 'JE's' (Jeffrey Epstein's) desk, and messy massage creams in JE's bathroom. Sally Markham responds, attempting to manage the situation by noting John is distracted by a family death, while also discussing administrative matters like resumes and the 'PB manual'.
DOJ-OGR-00015300.jpg
This document is a financial transaction report from Shoppers Travel, Inc., generated on April 27, 2016. It details a list of invoices issued to numerous individuals for travel services between January 11, 2001, and April 23, 2001. The report includes invoice dates, numbers, client names, transaction amounts, and a running balance, with some client names redacted by the Department of Justice (DOJ).
DOJ-OGR-00017163.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript featuring the summation by Ms. Menninger, likely in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The text focuses on discrediting the testimony of Juan Alessi regarding the household hierarchy involving Epstein and Ghislaine, as well as questioning the validity of evidence concerning a household manual and a black address book.
DOJ-OGR-00013069.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, showing the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Flatley. He is asked to read from an email dated May 25, 2001, sent from 'gmaxl@mindspring.com' to Sally Markham. The email contains a detailed list of complaints about the poor work performance of an individual named John, expressing the dissatisfaction of another individual referred to as 'JE'.
DOJ-OGR-00008959.jpg
This document is page 35 of a defense motion filed on Feb 11, 2022, in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It argues for a new trial or acquittal, citing potential testimony from two witnesses, Sally Markham (property manager) and Lynn Fontanilla (housekeeper), who could have rebutted government claims about Maxwell's role as 'lady of the house' and her presence at the 71st Street townhouse. The defense contends that a 'household manual' used as evidence against Maxwell was actually created by an individual known as 'the Countess.'
DOJ-OGR-00010405.jpg
This legal document is a portion of a filing, likely from the prosecution, arguing against a Defendant's claim of prejudice due to a delay in prosecution. The prosecution asserts that the Defendant has failed to meet the high legal standard for proving prejudice, citing case law. The Defendant's claims are based on the loss of documentary evidence (flight, financial, phone, and property records related to Epstein) and the deaths of four potential witnesses (architects Albert Pinto and Roger Salhi, and property manager Sally Markham).
DOJ-OGR-00009603.jpg
This document is a page from a government legal filing in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), dated February 25, 2022. The text argues against the defense's claims regarding missing witnesses (Sally Markham, Fontanilla) and disputes the origin of the 'household manual' (Gov Ex 606), citing email evidence (Gov Ex 424) that proves Maxwell was involved in its creation alongside Markham, rather than it being solely the work of 'the Countess.' The prosecution asserts that the absence of these witnesses did not prejudice the defendant's ability to defend herself or impact the facts of the abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00009600.jpg
This legal document is a court filing in which the defendant argues for the case to be dismissed due to substantial prejudice caused by pre-indictment delay. The defendant claims the deaths of several witnesses, including architects, a property manager, and a housekeeper who worked for Epstein, as well as others like Jeffrey Epstein himself, prevent a fair trial. The document indicates the Court has previously rejected these arguments as speculative and lacking evidence of actual prejudice.
DOJ-OGR-00014542.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Menninger, likely for a defense team. Menninger argues that the witness, Juan Alessi, is not credible by pointing out that he reported directly to Epstein, not Ghislaine, and by citing an email between Ghislaine and Sally Markham where Alessi's work was called 'truly awful'. She further undermines his credibility by discussing his inconsistent testimony regarding a household manual and a black address book.
Household Manual
Government Exhibit 424; email chain discussing the household manual, proving Maxwell's involvement in developing it.
Unknown (Blank)
Complaint list regarding staff member John, specific failures (Merc, JE's desk, pool deck, massage creams), and status check on the PB manual.
Response
Addressing complaints about John, mentioning John's personal issues (father-in-law's death), discussing Jerome's work hours, and resumes from NY.
No Subject
An email detailing a list of complaints against someone named John for poor performance on tasks such as stocking a car, replacing a light bulb, cleaning a pool deck, fixing a computer issue, and tidying a bathroom. The email expresses the dissatisfaction of someone referred to as 'JE'.
N/A (Not read in transcript)
Complaints about staff member John: missing water/pens in the 'black Merc', burnt out bulb on JE's desk, filthy pool deck, computer color card issues, and messy massage creams in JE's bathroom.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity