DOJ-OGR-00000521.jpg

553 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 553 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019, detailing a bail hearing. The prosecution, represented by Mr. Rossmiller, argues that the defendant should be detained, citing the defense's failure to provide detailed financial information and the legal presumption of detention for sex trafficking charges, which is strengthened by the defendant's prior sex offense conviction. The judge interacts with the prosecutor to clarify the government's burden of proof in the matter.

People (4)

Name Role Context
ROSSMILLER Mr.
Speaking on behalf of the government, arguing against bail for a defendant.
The Court Judge
Presiding over the hearing, questioning Mr. Rossmiller about the burden of proof.
your Honor Judge
A term of address used by Mr. Rossmiller when speaking to the judge.
defendant Defendant
The subject of the bail hearing, described as having 'tremendous means' and a prior conviction for a sex offense.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
The Court government agency
The judicial body hearing the case.
government government agency
The prosecuting party in the case, represented by Mr. Rossmiller.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding, listed at the bottom of the page.

Timeline (1 events)

2019-07-24
A court proceeding (likely a bail hearing) where the government argues for the detention of a defendant, citing a lack of financial disclosure, the nature of the charges (sex trafficking), and a prior conviction.
Courtroom
The Court MR. ROSSMILLER defendant (subject of hearing)

Relationships (1)

THE COURT professional MR. ROSSMILLER
The formal dialogue between the judge ('THE COURT') and the counsel ('MR. ROSSMILLER'), including the use of the term 'your Honor', indicates a professional relationship within a legal proceeding.

Key Quotes (2)

"It is accurate to say that you as the government has the burden of persuasion or proof in this instance. Right?"
Source
— THE COURT (The judge is clarifying the legal standard with the government's counsel, Mr. Rossmiller.)
DOJ-OGR-00000521.jpg
Quote #1
"Yes, your Honor. There are good reasons why sex trafficking has a presumption of detention and even more so where a defendant, as this defendant has, has previously been convicted of a sex offense."
Source
— MR. ROSSMILLER (Responding to the judge's question and arguing for the defendant's detention based on the charges and prior history.)
DOJ-OGR-00000521.jpg
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,405 characters)

Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 36 Filed 07/24/19 Page 11 of 74 11
1 provided no specific detailed financial information in its
2 submission. I'll get into that in a little bit more in a
3 moment.
4 But certainly the first question for a defendant of
5 this tremendous means is how much money does he have, where is
6 it, what are the accounts, is it in foreign accounts, how much
7 is in diamonds or art. These are all details that would be
8 necessary for the Court to even begin to consider this type of
9 application.
10 So, no. The presumption has not been rebutted.
11 However, your Honor, even if the defense were able to some
12 point to rebut the presumption by providing some more
13 information, there simply is no way that they can meet the
14 standard here.
15 The evaluation of the Bail Reform Act suggests that
16 all of those factors counsel in favor of remand, which we'll go
17 into in a little more detail.
18 THE COURT: It is accurate to say that you as the
19 government has the burden of persuasion or proof in this
20 instance. Right?
21 MR. ROSSMILLER: Yes, your Honor. There are good
22 reasons why sex trafficking has a presumption of detention and
23 even more so where a defendant, as this defendant has, has
24 previously been convicted of a sex offense.
25 And in connection with that, his dangerousness is
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00000521

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document