This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019, detailing a bail hearing. The prosecution, represented by Mr. Rossmiller, argues that the defendant should be detained, citing the defense's failure to provide detailed financial information and the legal presumption of detention for sex trafficking charges, which is strengthened by the defendant's prior sex offense conviction. The judge interacts with the prosecutor to clarify the government's burden of proof in the matter.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| ROSSMILLER | Mr. |
Speaking on behalf of the government, arguing against bail for a defendant.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, questioning Mr. Rossmiller about the burden of proof.
|
| your Honor | Judge |
A term of address used by Mr. Rossmiller when speaking to the judge.
|
| defendant | Defendant |
The subject of the bail hearing, described as having 'tremendous means' and a prior conviction for a sex offense.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court | government agency |
The judicial body hearing the case.
|
| government | government agency |
The prosecuting party in the case, represented by Mr. Rossmiller.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding, listed at the bottom of the page.
|
"It is accurate to say that you as the government has the burden of persuasion or proof in this instance. Right?"Source
"Yes, your Honor. There are good reasons why sex trafficking has a presumption of detention and even more so where a defendant, as this defendant has, has previously been convicted of a sex offense."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,405 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document